why critics don't like michael bay

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by pie125, Jun 24, 2014.

  1. pie125

    pie125 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Posts:
    1,135
    News Credits:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Likes:
    +3,148
    why critics don't like michael bay?
     
  2. Starscream Gaga

    Starscream Gaga Protoformed This Way

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Posts:
    9,607
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +5,709
    Because he makes mediocre movies.

    That's it.
     
  3. RazorX3000

    RazorX3000 Cybertronian Monkey

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Posts:
    2,265
    News Credits:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,075
    Is this a question or...?
     
  4. RazorX3000

    RazorX3000 Cybertronian Monkey

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Posts:
    2,265
    News Credits:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,075
    Your opinion.
     
  5. Starscream Gaga

    Starscream Gaga Protoformed This Way

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Posts:
    9,607
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +5,709
    And apparently the most critic's common opinion as well.

    That's really the only answer to the question. Michael Bay simply does not make films that respond well critically.
     
  6. celticgaurdian

    celticgaurdian Clean-up Crew

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Posts:
    536
    Trophy Points:
    91
    Likes:
    +25
    Expected an answer

    Received a question

    Alright then
     
  7. RazorX3000

    RazorX3000 Cybertronian Monkey

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Posts:
    2,265
    News Credits:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,075
    Indeed... But, I've only seen his Transformers films and that's it. I've seen a bit of Armageddon, but from what I saw, honestly it looked like another disaster film. But yeah, most critics are "Bay Haters". They simply don't like a film because, well, "Bay".
     
  8. Autobots14

    Autobots14 I'm pregant Trevor

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2014
    Posts:
    1,407
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Likes:
    +4
    Cause he's Micheal Bay :bay 
     
  9. RazorX3000

    RazorX3000 Cybertronian Monkey

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2012
    Posts:
    2,265
    News Credits:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,075
    Exactly my thoughts. The OP really should take notice of question marks.
     
  10. FanimusMaximus

    FanimusMaximus Kuphead

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Posts:
    16,665
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Location:
    Florida
    Likes:
    +578
    Because Pearl Harbor and ROTF mostly.
     
  11. a person

    a person Is not amused.

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Posts:
    3,815
    News Credits:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +13
    [​IMG]

    Oh yeah, totally. These movies are on par with sci-fi classics like Alien and 2001: A Space Odyssey, but it's only because they are Michael Bay films that they get poor reviews. We all know that if Ridley Scott or Christopher Nolan churned out the cinematic masterpiece that is Revenge of the Fallen, critics would have loved it! RIGHT?!
     
  12. Ash from Carolina

    Ash from Carolina Junior Smeghead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    15,964
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +3,191
    Unlike me and you critics have to watch all the films. Which means they have a larger pool of films to compare something to than we do. If the Bay films just seem to be treading the same old worn out waters while other films are doing something more interesting then critics aren't going to like the Bay film as much as the other film.

    Also seeing a ton of special effects every year makes it harder for critics to be impressed by effects alone. While Bay is top notch at visual aspect of film making when it comes to action, story telling, developing interesting villains, knowing what jokes will work, and several other elements just aren't his strong point as a film maker.

    Bay films also tend to get a little too long because for some reason Bay just doesn't believe in extended directors cut of a film so things get thrown in at seem like padding in the theatrical release that would feel like extras on a home release.

    Bay also has bit of bad luck in that his rise was about the same time as the quality of film making went down. Instead of studio heads saying make me a great movie the Hollywood motto changed to just make me a buck by not taking chances that someone will not get it or leave the theater unhappy because you didn't give them a clear cut happy ending. In a different era he might have been viewed better.
     
  13. OmegaPrime22

    OmegaPrime22 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2012
    Posts:
    2,036
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Likes:
    +135
    No because he actually makes fun summer movies that apparently critics dont like.
     
  14. DPrime

    DPrime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Posts:
    6,578
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +1,283
    Ebay:
    Seriously, wtf, man.

    Enjoy them all you want, but don't fool yourself - these aren't works of art. It shouldn't be that difficult to determine why film critics don't particularly like Bay's movies.

    That's like asking why a gourmet might not like McDonalds, even though a Big Mac can be pretty satisfying to most of us when we're in the right mood. :) 
     
  15. Ring3r

    Ring3r 5.0

    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Posts:
    1,217
    Trophy Points:
    142
    Likes:
    +24
    When somebody goes and makes brainless, awesome fun, for fun's sake, using a medium on which your entire career of waxing eloquent and pretending to be an art-snob depends upon....apparently it is very offensive.

    Mostly I just wonder why the fuck would anybody WANT to be an art snob. Art snobs are pathetic and usually miss the point entirely, just ask an artist.
     
  16. Galvatron II

    Galvatron II I can type whatever here?

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2013
    Posts:
    4,615
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +1,466
    Yet they do like fun summer movies like Indianna Jones and Star Wars and the Avengers. Strange, isn't it?

    Yes, caring about storytelling is "snobbish".

    Absolutely, ask the people that have the most reason to lob hate at critics. They're probably the most objective viewpoint you could ever find.
     
  17. Ring3r

    Ring3r 5.0

    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Posts:
    1,217
    Trophy Points:
    142
    Likes:
    +24
    Indiana Jones and Star Wars were not critical successes. They were initially reviewed as quite meh, and both series almost didn't get green-lit because the executives didn't think they had any potential.

    Nevermind the Episodes 1,2,3 and Crystal Skull.

    You really should pick better examples....lol
     
  18. Starscream Gaga

    Starscream Gaga Protoformed This Way

    Joined:
    May 19, 2011
    Posts:
    9,607
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +5,709
    I'm curious. If a "fun summer movie", suggesting it's merits are not in storytelling or acting, isn't mediocre, what is?
     
  19. DPrime

    DPrime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Posts:
    6,578
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +1,283
    Ebay:
    I think you're taking this a bit far. There's nothing wrong with prefering a little more substance to what you happen to enjoy, be it films, or whatever. Transformers, even.

    I mean, didn't we all prefer Transformers to Go-Bots back in the day? Does that make us "robot snobs"?

    Frankly I don't know why so many people here get so butthurt about people not loving Bay films. Just enjoy what you like, don't worry about it so much.
     
  20. Ceasar121

    Ceasar121 Wants a Toxitron repaint!

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Posts:
    3,283
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +652
    Avatar had better editing and pacing than ROTF, in every other way, they were about equal. I remember critics bashing Bay for doing some of the same things Avatar was praised for. ROTF wasn't as bad as critics made it out to be, and Avatar wasn't as good as it was made out to be. Bryan Singer actually got critical acclaim for the turd that was Superman Returns... So while Bay IS NOT a the best filmmaker, he does get knocked by critics for things they ignore or praise others for. Critics do tend to be harsher on his movies. Not to say he makes cinematic masterpieces, but if the point is to be entertained and have the audience like your film, he does a great job. His movies typically do way better than your would expect.

    This is one of the best posts I've ever read about Bay. Bravo sir.