Who should take responsibility for galaxy force/cybertron's continuity problem?

Discussion in 'Transformers General Discussion' started by youquzhiji, Nov 18, 2016.

  1. youquzhiji

    youquzhiji Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2016
    Posts:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    7
    Likes:
    +4
    I know this is a old question, but I didn't find convincing answers with proof through Internet. Was Unicron Trilogy intended to be the same universe, but Gonzo decided to start over; or it is Takara's idea to start over and Hasbro didn't follow?
     
  2. Nevermore

    Nevermore It's self-perpetuating a parahumanoidarianised!

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Posts:
    19,556
    News Credits:
    486
    Trophy Points:
    387
    Location:
    Germany
    Likes:
    +10,689
  3. Autovolt 127

    Autovolt 127 Get In The Titan, Prime!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    83,057
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    412
    Likes:
    +1,948
    I kind of figured that, I mean head designs for Energon and Cybertron's designs are pretty similar, same with Jetfire too.
     
  4. SPLIT LIP

    SPLIT LIP Formerly SPLIT LIP

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Posts:
    83,761
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    412
    Location:
    agile house
    Likes:
    +38,274
    Yeah, would expalin why the very Jetfire-looking "Dreadlock" wasn't Jetfire. Or why Megatron has very clear design cues from Unicron.

    And, well, we know Hasbro planned out all the UT stories before the actual TV shows were started. (as in each series was plotted before each show, not the entire UT)
     
  5. greboguru

    greboguru Psychedelic Brainchild

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Posts:
    2,720
    Trophy Points:
    322
    Location:
    California, USA
    Likes:
    +2,310
    I prefer Galaxy Force/Cybertron being in its own continuity. In fact, if anything, I like to think of Galaxy Force/Cybertron as being a sequel to Car Robots/RID2000.