The Military presence in the films...

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by Godzilla Ranger, Jul 19, 2010.

  1. Godzilla Ranger

    Godzilla Ranger AgentGodzillaRangerPrime

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Posts:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Likes:
    +2,011
    Is anyone sick of the military presence in the films?
    These are films about giant alien robots, not a military advertisment. I think it was ok in the first film, but it got out of hand in ROTF with the introduction of NEST.
    An example is the desert battle at the end of ROTF. Nearly the whole battle were scenes of NEST guys shooting bullets at the decepticons and getting blown up, while we see only short glimps of any of the Autobots. There were also the 2 minutes dedicated to planes taking off and the eventual extermination of Devestator by not an Autobot, but a classified military weapon. Hell, we get a lot of this at the beginning of the Shanghai mission. Why don't they just focus on scenes with Lennox and Epps. Hopefully they tone it down in TF3, but from what I've seen, it's might not happen.

    What do you guys think?
     
  2. Starscreamer95

    Starscreamer95 Barely active here

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Posts:
    9,249
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    242
    Location:
    Australia
    Likes:
    +101
    Well, in a movie like this, the millitary is indeed in need of screen time.
    However, I do agree that the final battle in ROTF may have been a little low in showing us any of the Autobots...

    Hopefully TF3 shows us a hell of a lot of what we want, which, as Chicargo is the 'final battle' or something.. I can see the Autobots getting a lot more screen time.
     
  3. Scythe

    Scythe Future Foundation

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Posts:
    4,279
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Likes:
    +9
    I thought it was too much too, which makes me think: With the attention to military presence and explosions, why didn't Bay direct G.I. Joe?
     
  4. Santoanderson

    Santoanderson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Posts:
    702
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +0
    I'm getting sick of it. It feels like having a CG transformer on screen costs 5 million dollars a minute, and Bay, trying to fill-up screen time on the cheap, uses the military.

    And don't get me started with the whole "Military kills Devastator with one shot" scene.
     
  5. Starscreamer95

    Starscreamer95 Barely active here

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Posts:
    9,249
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    242
    Location:
    Australia
    Likes:
    +101
    Because G.I Joe's elements.. Aren't exactly real enough for Bay, hence why NEST are useing real weapons.
     
  6. ectoneon

    ectoneon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Posts:
    1,489
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +8
    I don't mind the military as it's kinda necessary. No military screen time means no movie deal with them, wich means no military vehicle altmodes. Seriously -the ammount of co-operation bay has gotten from the military is astounding. But I would have to agree they need to focus more on Lennox and Eps. They were a good team in the first film, ROTF they just seemed like they were there for the heck of it.
     
  7. jhrvaudio

    jhrvaudio Active Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Posts:
    42
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    37
    Likes:
    +4
    That's why the final battle needs to be set on Cybertron = No humans..
     
  8. hound88

    hound88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Posts:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Likes:
    +0
    it is more than too much in ROTF. THe battle shooting scene near the end is just boom boom boom boom boom explosions here and there. We wanna see robots fight, not stupid military.
    Check out www.tfbase.com where there's a comment about ROTF and what made ROTF such a bad movie.
     
  9. Scythe

    Scythe Future Foundation

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2008
    Posts:
    4,279
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Likes:
    +9
    Yeah, but that B.F.G. that took out Devs wasn't exactly realistic.
     
  10. Merman Jones

    Merman Jones Friend of the Tapirs

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Posts:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Likes:
    +0
    I think the military add scale and dimension to the battle sequences. If it was just TFs it would feel more like a robot street fight, which is fun, but not hollywood-level epic. Supposing the final battle in ROTF was just bots, the screen would seem empty; just 20 odd TFs in the middle of a desert, which is hardly a battle.
     
  11. Bumblethumper

    Bumblethumper old misery guts

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Posts:
    9,736
    News Credits:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    332
    Likes:
    +1,621
    I hate it. I hate that a movie based on children's toys becomes a recruitment tool for making military look all tough and awesome.

    Having a military presence in the films is probably inevitable, but they shouldn't take the focus away from transformers. They should be more of a background element.
     
  12. Silk Spectre

    Silk Spectre The Evil Queen

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Posts:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +81
    I have no problem with the military presence in the movies - I loved the idea of NEST and wanted to see more of it.

    I would much rather see NEST than Sam at college, Sam struggling through a normal life/job. With annoying characters like Leo eating up screen time.

    If we'd seen more of NEST we would've seen more of the rest of the Autobots, not to mention more of the Decepticons.
     
  13. Ash from Carolina

    Ash from Carolina Junior Smeghead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    15,966
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +3,224
    I thought it was handled well in the first movie until we got to the last battle. The first 3/4th seemed to handle it really well, the military wasn't a total pushover, but it felt like they really needed the Autobots to save the day. Plus the squad that Lennox had seemed like a good place to mine some good characters for the film, the sort of people you might be able to worry about in a fight.

    The last battle in the first film though is where the military aspect started to feel out of control. Killing Blackout and the human weapons hitting the Decepticons so hard started this feeling of we don't really need the Autobots, if you just added more humans and more weapons then the humans could carry the day all by themselves.

    Revenge of the Fallen just had this feeling of other than Prime taking on The Fallen the Autobots were not needed at all. Since NEST has equipment now that can detect Decepticons, air strikes can slaughter large numbers of Decepticons, they even have a rail gun that can take out any Decepticon. Well it just feels like the Autobots could go on vacation because the military can kick the Decepticons butt anywhere any time.
     
  14. Primus

    Primus Beware, the modelers. Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2002
    Posts:
    4,145
    News Credits:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    267
    Likes:
    +15
    Chicago is actually Metroplex.

    Back on topic, I think the military involvement in TF3 will be quite interesting depending on the storyline. I agree that I would prefer a bit more Autobot vs. Decepticon though.
     
  15. Roadtrack

    Roadtrack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Posts:
    524
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Likes:
    +0
    I don't think we will see too much millitary in the Chicago battle. We didn't saw tanks, NEST vehicles. All we saw were a bunch of soldiers running around. The emphasis was put on the Autubots' alt modes.
     
  16. Lock Cade

    Lock Cade Tarn Fangirl

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Posts:
    27,199
    Trophy Points:
    392
    Location:
    Michigan
    Likes:
    +414
    My feelings exactly.
     
  17. DrLee

    DrLee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Posts:
    1,467
    News Credits:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    192
    Likes:
    +97
    there's not a chance in hell that you can have live action TF movie on Earth.... without military.... not a chance.
     
  18. Tkemert20

    Tkemert20 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Posts:
    3,642
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    292
    Likes:
    +625
    Seriously, think about it. If huge-ass evil aliens came to earth, do you expect the military to sit back and relax? Common sense right there.
     
  19. Bayless

    Bayless Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Posts:
    463
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    this
     
  20. Ash from Carolina

    Ash from Carolina Junior Smeghead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    15,966
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +3,224
    I'm going to have to disagree.

    As large as the combined military force is of the entire world is we still don't have military bases and personnel by every single place on Earth.

    Plus it takes time to scramble aircraft, to move ships, to move tanks and other equipment. Not to mention that any military needs some sort of assessment of the situation. You can't send in the military every time something goes boom because sometime the boom isn't the bad guys it's just an accident with something like a gas main.

    Depending on how long the battle was it's realist to say the Autobots and Decepticons might be done fighting by the time the military figured out it was a battle and could get boots on the ground.