Why are you browsing IMDb? You know most of that stuff is user-made, right? It's like going on wikipedia.
I dunno. IMDB as a source? Unlikely. They'd do an actual press release. Not that Robocop was a bad movie. I'd probably rent the sequel, or get it cheap.
I was about to ask if the remake earned enough to warrent a sequel, but IMDB... really? I wouldn't trust the same "news" if it was comming from Wikipedia, but I would say that, in-general, Wiki info is more trustworthy than IMDB info.
It made just over $242 million worldwide, but it cost $100 million to make, not including marketing. So, I'm not real sure if it ultimately made a profit for the studio. I suppose that could still happen if it sells well on Blu-ray and DVD, but I wouldn't trust IMDB regardless.
First one was nothing more than average. But based on that title alone, I'd definitely see this in theaters.