Alright, so I know what you're probably thinking. "Another stupid thread about a already highly discussed topic? Not again!" But honestly, I would like to share with you all an issue which has been bothering me highly these past few days. The issue being the Dinobots in Age of Extinction. When reading people's reactions on these threads, I see the same comment placed repetitively by multiple users, the comment in one variation being "The Dinobots were sh*t! They didn't do anything!" And "They were shoehorned in at the last minute!" And of course, "It was all Michael Bay's fault! He ruined the Dinobots too!" Now I ask you, what if they were not "shoehorned" in as many say? We all remember that Grimlock was one of the first things we saw in the trailers, so they were obviously not last-minute. Perhaps this was, for say, an introduction of sorts. There were quite a few Dinobots, and the story brought their involvement in later, meaning there wasn't much time for "Hey I'm Grimlock, that's Strafe, that's Slug,..etc.) The Autobots were being completely outnumbered by the vehicons, Hound was out of ammo and on the verge or being overwhelmed, along with Bumblebee. Optimus, Drift, and Crosshairs had crashed quite a few miles away from the main action. They had a pod with Legendary Warriors in it. Optimus quickly fought and gained their respect, and unleashed pure hell on Galvatron's forces. So to those who say the Dinobots didn't do anything, honestly, I believe you are wrong. They won most of the battle by eliminating the remainder of vehicons in the city. There will be a TF5, so as mentioned earlier, what if this was just their introduction? Their involvement in these films may very much increase in the next one. After all, every character needs to have an introduction. Just my two cents.