Um, is that a mold for a hand?

 

Well FT-02 was supposed to be Soundwave.

FT-03, with little articulated fingers--looks like Blaster is still in the works.

 

If I remember correctly, and I could be mixing the two up, but I think that FT-03 was supposed to be Shockwave and FT-04 was going to be Blaster.

Like I said though, I could be "misremembering". And, of course, that was all before FT-02 got scrapped. So who knows...

 

Well, I'm very happy to know that Soundwave wasn't their only hope. I look forward to seeing what this FT-03 winds up being. And using the casting die as a tease is awesome.

 

Shockwave would be great! That's actually a better idea than Blaster, since a lot of people (including me, probably) would hold off on Blaster figuring that a Takara one is inevitable. But there's licensing issues with Shockwave, right? So official competition is unlikely.

 

either one is fine with me. do it FT.

 

Shockwave or bust for me, too much going on atm so im sticking to official MP's. Only thing that will sway me is a MP Shockwave.

 

no idea what I'm looking at, but I'm glad they're still around! Guessing this is close to release, to keep HasTak from one-upping them again.

 

gwarn show us shockwave so takara push their forward lol ( sorry )

 

Teaser rule number one: show as little as possible. The less info about the actual product, the better.

 

FT-03 Blaster!!! Woot!

 

either one is good for me

 

Link does not work.

 

What are you talking about? If it's the image, I've attached it to this post.

 

its not a link its a picture

 

If it's not coming up, then it's shown as a link..  

 

Cute, but no. All I got was a red X, which is now just a blank . And when the OP's post is quoted, there's a link that doesn't seem to work (clicked it a few times to no avail). Could be browser issues on my end. Either way, attaching pictures is sometimes better in case people are having problems viewing the images/links, so thanks for that.

 

works fine on my end.

 

Honestly, I regret posting that I even had problems viewing the image since it ballooned into a stupid back-and-forth. Anyway, it works for me now as well (@ home using Firefox). My work computer uses Explorer, which is where I was posting from earlier. Again, browser-related issues.