Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by tgd124, Oct 6, 2012.
They didn’t look like deformed frogs, at least.
For Optimus in AOE and the Last Knight more like a cat nose
Woow it's almost as if...they weren't meant to last longer than 5 seconds worth of screen time. Hate them or not, they were there because Travis really wanted to express his love to the franchise by giving them enough time to do their thing and then leave before people found out where the CGI budget went. It makes me a little ticked off that Paramount could have at least given the movie a couple million dollars more to patch stuff up, but the camera work was great to hide the lack of detail. Bay would have just said "For the Autobots let's just have Bee and Prime so we can put the rest into America's military for more boom-boom".
I promise you that once the sequel films come with more budget the rest of the Autobots and Decepticons will look 100x better then they did in Bumblebee. No 'skull faces', no reused assets, no obvious cheap stock fx.
HD version of full body Blitzy you can see his wound that Bee stabbed him on his back
Get Optimus Prime and the other autobots rendition in HD
What's the point you say. Clearly your not a fan.
That’s pretty much why people like these designs. It’s out of pure nostalgia. I do give them some slack because the designers at ILM had to rush these, but they are hardly better than Bayverse. I would much rather have the Bayverse designs than whatever these are.
Hey guys can someone find me some good cgi transparent renderings of the 2007 movie Decepticons?
Bee Shockwave in HD
Separate names with a comma.