Who was worse, Malkovich or Jeong?

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by PrimesRule, Jun 30, 2012.

  1. figsdad

    figsdad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Posts:
    2,584
    News Credits:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +749
    But imagine the films without the comedy they would be the fans dream
     
  2. Autovolt 127

    Autovolt 127 Get In The Titan, Prime!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    83,294
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    462
    Likes:
    +2,914
    Pretty much. I liked Jeong in movies like Knocked Up, Role Models and The Hangover while Malkovitch is a badass bad guy in The line of Fire.

    Shia's only decent role was in Disturbia.
     
  3. D-Unit

    D-Unit #1 Heel

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Posts:
    4,215
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +438
    Ebay:
    Jeong....I have yet to find him entertaining in any role I've seen him in, DOTM included
     
  4. Thenames9

    Thenames9 D-d-d-d-duel!

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Posts:
    5,840
    News Credits:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    247
    Likes:
    +58
    I liked them both. They were the only points in the film that people laughed at.
     
  5. Nag

    Nag Dinobot Commander

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Posts:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    47
    Likes:
    +1
    Jeong's part in the film was awful... you know there's something very wrong when you actually prefer Leo Spitz over them.
     
  6. Gingerchris

    Gingerchris Telly-headed Tyrant

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Posts:
    16,047
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    387
    Likes:
    +2,327
    I think that's a regular problem of BayFormers, that several times some human characters could've been combined together and probably ended up being better for it. BayFormers humans tend to be one-note wonders rather than having any layers. It's like 'Haha! Let's have a crazy conspiracy guy at Sam's job!' and then 'Haha! Let's have Sam's boss be weird and eccentric!' rather than perhaps 'Let's have Sam's boss be crazy and eccentric and also a bit of a conspiracy guy'. Make one two-ply tissue-thin character rather than two one-ply tissue-thin characters. He may still be tissue-thin but he's probably better for having more than one layer to him.
    Not to mention a likely saving of screentime by not having to set-up and follow and pay off so many single-layer human characters. A good writer will look at where perhaps just one character can fulfil the story requirements of two or more characters and combine those to make things more streamlined.
     
  7. Smashs

    Smashs Internet: Pure Truth Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2011
    Posts:
    7,684
    News Credits:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    317
    Location:
    WY
    Likes:
    +1,198
    I love anything Malkovich does, and I thought he played the self-loving, douchey boss perfectly.

    Every scene with Jeong could have been cut and the film would benefit from it. Get the manifesto elsewhere.
     
  8. Twintwist8

    Twintwist8 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2011
    Posts:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    After reading the books, and seeing the movie a good dozen times. I see both of the characters being ok and needed. Considering we didn't get to see Megatron step on Leo in RotF... I'll take both Jeong and Malkovich. And "Wang" was being extreme on purpose, because he knew his MINUTES were numbered. Loved him giving Malkovich the "what for, in yo face" speech before leaving the bathroom... and everytime I see that stall scene... I wonder how many takes it took without Shia just bursting into laughter...
     
  9. Silk Spectre

    Silk Spectre The Evil Queen

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Posts:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +81
    Yeah, much of the focus was given to the quirky, goofy characters in the movies to play up the humor (Sam himself is enough - but we also have had Leo, Sam's parents, Wang, and Simmons, and of course with the TFs there was Skids and Mudflap). Characters like Epps and Lennox get pushed aside. And Sideswipe, Ratchet and Ironhide got pushed aside for the Twins in ROTF. A couple of quirky characters would've been fine, but drowning in them is a no-go.

    My pick would be Jeong. "Deep Wang" made me appreciate Leo Spitz a tiny bit. At least with Leo he was a geeky college kid who got pulled in over his head, so when he freaked out, it was semi realistic, if annoying.

    The milk scene in the elevator and the bathroom stall scene with the "manifesto"? Way past the point of silly. The role Wang played in the story was hampered by sheer ridiculousness.

    I don't have much appreciation for Bruce Brazos either (though I must admit to liking his "fuckin' awesome" line upon seeing Bee, maybe because I might have had that reaction myself :cool: ), but I think the character and Dylan Gould could have been combined - have Brazos be the one that was working the 'Cons.
     
  10. PrimesRule

    PrimesRule Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Posts:
    1,609
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +4
    He is the only comedy that should've been used for the TF movies because he is the most tolerable, aside from thong underwear. At least he himself matured in DOTM.
     
  11. Silk Spectre

    Silk Spectre The Evil Queen

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Posts:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +81
    Yeah, I do like him overall. Like you, I think the thong scene shouldn't exist.

    The main problem is that he's in a sea of other quirky characters. It's simply a case of it being too much. Like in ROTF, he was with Sam, Leo, and the Twins. It was a case of too many quirky characters. Replace the Twins, with two other Autobots, and cut Leo, and I think you'd have a more interesting [not annoying] group.

    I definitely could've done with just him and Sam, as far as quirky/comedy characters go.
     
  12. Matrixbeast

    Matrixbeast Here comes a thought

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts:
    9,241
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +1,672
    Ebay:
    I liked Dr. Ken in the Hangover.
    DOTM...Not so much. Though honestly, I could do without both. Jeong manged to get a chuckle out of me, at least.
     
  13. PrimesRule

    PrimesRule Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Posts:
    1,609
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +4
    Twins could've easily been replaced with the Arcee triplets or Jolt. That way, they would get larger roles and decent characterization.
     
  14. jala12

    jala12 Fiery Adventurer

    Joined:
    May 2, 2009
    Posts:
    3,992
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +1,290
    Jeong. He had an important role, but the manner in which his character was presented was very distracting and unecessary. I'm sure there were a number of people in the audiences who missed out on what the deal with him was.
     
  15. Autovolt 127

    Autovolt 127 Get In The Titan, Prime!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    83,294
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    462
    Likes:
    +2,914
    Exactly.

    and with Grey Delisle voicing Arcee that was such as hugely missed opurtunity. She deserved to portray the charecter better.

    I envisioned Jolt voiced by Curtis Armstrong (Dan from Dan V.S)
     
  16. UltraAlanMagnus

    UltraAlanMagnus See ya!

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Posts:
    12,775
    News Credits:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +2,667
    I hate Dan VS. I wanted Jolt to be voiced by Nolan North instead.
     
  17. LigerPrime

    LigerPrime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2002
    Posts:
    26,952
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    412
    Likes:
    +7,052
    Can I say both? LOL? I guess Jeong for me.