Bombusbee / Devil Savior Movie Devastator

Discussion in 'Transformers 3rd Party Discussion' started by Operative294, Jun 10, 2019.

  1. Curium

    Curium Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2014
    Posts:
    11,537
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    277
    Likes:
    +12,487
    Sorry if I missed something, but 4 or 5 of the 7 are up for preorder with prices.
     
  2. octobotimus

    octobotimus Bad company ruins good morals

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2017
    Posts:
    27,543
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    327
    Location:
    Washington
    Likes:
    +84,032
    Ebay:
    Instagram:
    From a questionable site with a history of wacky pricing.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. RinAldo

    RinAldo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Posts:
    383
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Likes:
    +1,755
    Using the "Legend ROTF 2009" project for an MPM 3P format is a poor choice especially for the general aesthetics of the robot: 1) the first most evident detail, is the two wheels that are too small, with only a single lateral support structure, where both have a joint that moves the wheels for a short angle up and down, but not laterally; 2) a large "jointed arm" remains in evidence above the head (to which it is attached); 3) the excavator tracks are in evidence at the back of the robot; 4) the arms of the robot, are positioned more forward than the two sections of the hull of the excavator (they are therefore, two pairs of separate structures... the two sections of hull are fixed, while the articulated arms can be positioned)! All these details are not in line with the CGI of the film... the "accurate movie" feature of Scavenger SS is definitely superior! Different speech for the alternative mode, where the DS excavator is well made, especially in the general structure of the arm, with the "fake pistons" in relief on the outer sides, and a better structure of the bucket; instead the SS excavator "is weak" on these details... since the Hasbro designers have preferred to make the fake pistons, only on the inner side of the two sections of arms (visible only in robot mode)... when the arm is raised the two fake lower pistons are visible (okay)... but what I don't understand, is bacause to realize two fake pistons on the upper part of the arm, non-existent on the real RH400? Fortunately, this detail of the side pistons can be solved with additional components! Other minor details are: 1) the DS excavator scale positioned too far forward, but only for a question of designing the transformation); 2) the SS Excavator, has the tracks a little smaller (but justified by the fact that they "integrate" into a wheel); 3) the position of the arm on the high section of the hull of the SS excavator, is more in line with the real RH400... the arm of the DS excavator is positioned more in the center; and finally, seen from behind they are both ugly... since the robot's wheels are visible!

    1 Scavenger comparison.png
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 8
  4. jru42287

    jru42287 Ass Möde is a way of life.

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Posts:
    17,294
    News Credits:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +21,167
    You really have way too much time on your hands, huh?
     
    • Like Like x 8
  5. demoBlitz

    demoBlitz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2019
    Posts:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    27
    Likes:
    +5
    is it me or the arms are too skinny?
     
     
  6. Shizuka

    Shizuka Optimus Prime's Scriptor

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Posts:
    6,622
    News Credits:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +3,970
    Not enough to paragraph.

    I'm kidding.
     
    Last edited: Nov 28, 2019
    • Like Like x 3
  7. eliot

    eliot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2017
    Posts:
    296
    Trophy Points:
    132
    Likes:
    +247
    Yeah, this guy isn't great. It looks a cad work in progress..., the blocks on the chest, to set the mass and shape, haven't been further worked on. Even the legends figure had longer arms. It's another case of the bot mode sacrifice for another mode. Altmode looks not great too, like the back end and front end a seperate, which obviously is a transform seam, but it does less to hide it
     
  8. Prime135

    Prime135 Friend of Arcee

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Posts:
    16,755
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Likes:
    +21,766
    Tumblr:
    Raises hand, same. (Well I did before selling everything)

    I’ll say it again though, these guys are too small for a masterpiece shelf. MPM is 1/29th. At that scale devy should be like 3 and a half feet tall. And no one tell me it can’t be done!!! (Gestures at FT fortress maximus)
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2019
  9. D0nut

    D0nut Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2018
    Posts:
    912
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Likes:
    +1,789
    G1 Fort max ≠ Bay Devastator
     
  10. Prime135

    Prime135 Friend of Arcee

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Posts:
    16,755
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Likes:
    +21,766
    Tumblr:
    Exactly, G1 fort max is harder because he has to support his weight vertically and not fall over.
     
  11. octobotimus

    octobotimus Bad company ruins good morals

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2017
    Posts:
    27,543
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    327
    Location:
    Washington
    Likes:
    +84,032
    Ebay:
    Instagram:
    Transformers in general are hard.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  12. Prime135

    Prime135 Friend of Arcee

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Posts:
    16,755
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Likes:
    +21,766
    Tumblr:
    Fair enough lol

    I do like these guys, it’s just, as I’ve said before, they’re about 10% left of center when it comes to nailing the Constructicons in both modes. Some are closer than others, but none are spot on save maybe long haul.
     
  13. Shmoptimus Prime

    Shmoptimus Prime Za Warudo!

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Posts:
    19,770
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    417
    Likes:
    +79,546
    Ebay:
    Instagram:
    If I were still on the fence about these guys (as of now I don't think I'll be getting more than one or two of them) I'd wait til the full set is revealed and at least two are released to check for quality/final prices, get the ones I loved as individual figures as they release, then when the full set is out if it's well reviewed then fill in the gaps.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Nikkal101

    Nikkal101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2018
    Posts:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Likes:
    +518
    TF direct says the combiner will be 50cm tall. For reference, look at the oversized AOE Leader Class Grimlock or oversized DOTM Voyager Megatron from a few years back. Those are 50cm tall figs. If their combiner will be that tall, I am sure it is close to MPM scale.

    To get an idea of what im talking about here is a size comparison with Leader Class Optimus from AOE...
    Screenshot_20191201-152222.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2019
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Bee Camaro

    Bee Camaro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2019
    Posts:
    827
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Likes:
    +2,464
    An MPM carbot (1:29) scaled Devy would have to be 108cm.
    MPM-4/6/8 (1:35 i believe) would have to be 89cm.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tonysandlin

    tonysandlin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Posts:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +9,171
    Yeah, I'd much prefer the MPM04 scale for the larger robots. 19 cm is a huge difference.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Nikkal101

    Nikkal101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2018
    Posts:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Likes:
    +518
    While I do agree with the actual scale proportions you are listing, all I am saying is this (from Primes Head to Grimlocks head):

    Screenshot_20191201-152222.jpg

    ...is not too far off from this: (Primes head to Devys head) if indeed the figure will be around 50cm: 20191201_154336.jpg

    This would definitely look better than say studio series Devy next to say MPM prime. But yes, I do agree if we are to scale the vehicle modes of each constructicon properly, Devestator would be much taller by default.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Prime135

    Prime135 Friend of Arcee

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2014
    Posts:
    16,755
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Likes:
    +21,766
    Tumblr:
    Only problem with that is most of the 3rd party MPMs that have been released (or are scheduled for release) have been 1/29th. It also lines up pretty spot on with the robot mode scaling for the G1 masterpiece line. Still baffles me why Hasbro chose to shrink prime, and by extension the other large scale movie masterpieces.

    Keep in mind, Devastator has very different proportions than that grimlock.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. Nikkal101

    Nikkal101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2018
    Posts:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    122
    Likes:
    +518
    Im comparing head to head height to get a general idea of what to expect and what shelf I would use if true and if I decide to get it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Bee Camaro

    Bee Camaro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2019
    Posts:
    827
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Likes:
    +2,464
    Isn't that Prime shorter than the MPM?

    I can see it working nicely with the MPM-4 scale though, but not perfectly.
     
    • Like Like x 1