Paramount Reveals The Possible Identity Of The Mysterious Seeker From Bumblebee Trailer

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by SilverOptimus, Jun 20, 2018.

  1. Prime Aspect

    Prime Aspect Visual Synthesis Engineer

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Posts:
    732
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +429
    Ebay:
    With all the complaining and controversy, I'd not be surprised if the seeker turns out to be a previously unknown RainMaker called "shitstorm" :D 
     
    • Like Like x 6
  2. RodimusSupreme

    RodimusSupreme Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2018
    Posts:
    2,629
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Location:
    In a galaxy far, far away...
    Likes:
    +3,690
    Twitter:
    YouTube (Legacy):
    Now I wonder if maybe the scene of
    the Seeker dying
    was a fake scene all along meant to fool the test audience so as to not give a way that Starscream was in this movie and that he was
    meant to survive
    all along?
    Uh, no, no, and no. This isn't the same as getting a 6-foot-something African American Actor to play a character previously played by another 6-foot-something African American actor (thinking of Terrence Howard/Don Cheadle as Rhodey/War Machine is the MCU), this is a giant alien robot who is designed the way he looked in the first movie in 2007, but somehow doesn't look anything like that in the 1980's. And
    being frozen
    completely stops any ability to simply
    reformat his body somehow.
    It is a straight-up; no if's, and's, or but's about it, Continuity Error. And like I said, considering that Hasbro has stepped in and taken some control away from Paramount because they just couldn't get this franchise where they all wanted it, I'd say a continuity error like that would not be easily overlooked or just left alone if it was discovered. I feel this is strong evidence that they plan to disconnect it from the last 5 movies and use it as the first movie in a new Transformers/Hasbro Live-Action Movie Universe.
    ...No...no it doesn't...
    [​IMG]
    And this is the only Movieverse Ramjet figure Hasbro ever released.
     
    Last edited: Jul 3, 2018
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Burnout00012

    Burnout00012 SKREEEEEEEOONK

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Posts:
    4,724
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +11,503
    I mean, not to be pedantic, but...

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 7
  4. Autobot Burnout

    Autobot Burnout ...and I'll whisper "No."

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Posts:
    45,202
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Location:
    [REDACTED]
    Likes:
    +40,522
    While this was actually named Thrust - because the Breakaway retool was a red guy outright named Thrust complete with pointy head - the two-pack version looks suspiciously very Ramjet like.
    [​IMG]

    Plus, it isn't like the toys ever have real weight with the actual movie lore or plot or whatever. The G1 Jazz Target exclusive deco had a bio implying he survived getting ripped in half by Megatron.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  5. Mospeada

    Mospeada Since '84

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Posts:
    2,271
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Likes:
    +9
    Thank you, Burnout, I was just going to post that. He looks like the 2007 figure. I have that Claw Slash Ramjet, and he looks like that. I'm not saying it's actually Ramjet, of course it was more likely to be Starscream. But it looks like that Ramjet figure.
     
  6. Jamocha101

    Jamocha101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    Posts:
    1,441
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Likes:
    +218
    Then consider it a reboot if that's what settles your cognitive dissonance. Other members of the audience will be able to suspend their disbelief if they wish to consider Bumblebee a part of the '07 continuity.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. User_136440

    User_136440 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    7,751
    News Credits:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Likes:
    +2,391
    I think you mean Terence Howard (Terence Stamp to Don Cheadle would be a significant change lol ).

    I think we'll all have agree to disagree here. I guess some people will be ok with it and others won't if it doesn't prove to be some kind of reboot.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 24, 2018
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Venixion

    Venixion Its always the middle of the night in Moonside

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2013
    Posts:
    25,428
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    362
    Location:
    California
    Likes:
    +40,858
    Well then...
     
  9. cappeca

    cappeca wtf is this?

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Posts:
    2,032
    Trophy Points:
    292
    Likes:
    +224
    Mistery solved! :lolol 
     
  10. John TheDestroyer

    John TheDestroyer Cognitive ability of a rock

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Posts:
    8,708
    News Credits:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    247
    Location:
    Oklahoma, USA
    Likes:
    +25,255
    Kinda looks like a complete physical overhaul of his robot limbs to me.

    transformers-barricade-statue-prime1-studio-903206-03.jpg Barry.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. dCon

    dCon mecha-former

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Posts:
    2,601
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,448
    1st paragraph: Yes on YouTube these idiots were coming up with all kinds of Bullshit saying it was Ramjet & they knew that and anyone that thought it was Starscream was stupid yada yada yada ya. I of course argued with them.

    2nd paragraph: Yea it was said it was Starscream inside the screening by members of Hasbro's cinema team that showed it off. And with that logic then Bumblebee is too small to fill in Plus we don't know the story, if it really will connect to 2007, OR seen Starscream's legs yet. For all we know they are taking the same story but redoing it fixing character designs, character plots, and plot holes ect. It's very possible.
     
  12. dCon

    dCon mecha-former

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Posts:
    2,601
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +1,448
    OH REEEALLY? That's pretty cool and it actually matches up what I just replied to Autobot Burnout about Starscream going from 2018 G1 movie Starscream to the chicken-legged dorito Starscream, which was maybe Hasbro wants to keep the main parts of the story and just redo it with better character development, better character designs, and fill in plot holes ect. Your post here makes me believe I might be on the right track. Thanks !
     
  13. Autobot Burnout

    Autobot Burnout ...and I'll whisper "No."

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Posts:
    45,202
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Location:
    [REDACTED]
    Likes:
    +40,522
    FFS that isn't even in the same league as the difference between the Trailer seeker and movie Starscream. Yes, the robot mode is more different than I thought, but for the most part the proportions are just the same between them, parts are GENERALLY in the same place (he even still has the spike plates on the front of his feet), and ultimately just the same core body with shifted body armor. And much less a radical transformation than AoE Bumblebee going from the Charger to the Stinger copy.

    Well, I don't pay attention to youtube videos of that nature, so I was unaware of that stuff.

    Strange how TFW didn't cover that at any point.

    Bumblebee is noticeably smaller in the trailer than he is in the first film, which is set about 20 years later. The given story is that this is a much younger Bumblebee than the one we know from the films. Plus you can still identify the major details from the original movie design that this younger,shorter one 'grows' into - shoulder details, wheels behind the shoulders, door wings (admittedly VW mode has them closed on the back as opposed to open on the Camaro mode), and his head is more or less identical as well.

    Why is everybody hung up on not seeing the legs? Why the HELL would they go for a straight G1 robot mode only in the upper body and then make chicken legs? Kind of missing the point entirely there.

    It really is confusing what Paramount is doing now - we still don't know if it's a hard reboot or not.

    If the plot summary of the screening I was told is still accurate, then the BB film has far more in common with Iron Giant than the 2007 film.

    And just because Megatron pops up still frozen in ice but with a more G1 design means nothing. After all, he's still frozen. How do you explain him changing body forms when he can't physically move in the twenty years between this film and the 2007 film? That's a plot hole right out of the gate!
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Fox13

    Fox13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2013
    Posts:
    442
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    182
    Likes:
    +810
    Did "Ramjet" actually come from one of the users that allegedly saw an early screening or is that speculation?

    "Ramjet" sounds a bit lame and I'd have imagined they'd have gone with something a bit more intimidating (though I guess it would fit with a G1-ish vibe).
     
  15. TheSoundwave

    TheSoundwave Bounty Hunter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2013
    Posts:
    8,119
    News Credits:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Location:
    Jabba's Palace
    Likes:
    +16,110
    As far as I can tell, "Ramjet" is just speculation.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  16. SimbaTron

    SimbaTron Transformers & Gundam

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Posts:
    1,114
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Location:
    England,UK
    Likes:
    +1,174
    It's speculation
     
    • Like Like x 3
  17. jackgaughan

    jackgaughan Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Posts:
    8,573
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +6,672
    Mostly because of the red and white colour scheme, which does work for Starscream, but Ramjets the original pale lad.

    It also means that if it isn't Starscream they can kill him off without any snafus.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  18. Fox13

    Fox13 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2013
    Posts:
    442
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    182
    Likes:
    +810
    Thanks, I had a feeling it was speculation.

    Personally I think it's a stretch to cling to Ramjet because of a repaint from the 2007 line. The design is obviously a representation of Starscream, but if the character itself isn't Starscream then they may as well call him anything they want.
     
  19. Autobot Burnout

    Autobot Burnout ...and I'll whisper "No."

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Posts:
    45,202
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    467
    Location:
    [REDACTED]
    Likes:
    +40,522
    Nobody cares about the 2007 repaint, the G1 Ramjet design was mostly white with red highlights and black trim, which is why he's speculated to be the character if it isn't Starscream as he's the closest second match to a user of that color pallete.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  20. Jochimus

    Jochimus Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb!

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    3,490
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Location:
    Shelby, IA USA
    Likes:
    +4,262
    IF the Seeker (which I still think is a better thing to call him at this point than Starscream, and INFINITELY better than calling him Ramjet) is Starscream...and IF he dies at the end of this movie...

    ...I think it'd be funny as all hell watching the spit fly from all sides if Knight and Hodson somehow retconned in Starscream's whole "mutant spark" bit from G1/BW.
     
    • Like Like x 3