But they do that for old movies, too. They don't do it because they don't have clips, they do it because of Youtube's copyright stuff.
Edit: Sorry. Somehow, I posted in the wrong topic and i didn't realize it until just now (two weeks from then) jD001
Batman v Superman – Nostalgia Critic | Channel Awesome Not much of a fan of the clipless reviews but this one was pretty good. Question for those who have seen the movie: When's the first time superman is exposed to kryptonite? If it's the fight with batman then how do batman and lex know it will hurt superman?
The kryptonite is introduced way early on in BvS, and Luthor tests its effects on General Zod's body. Batman finds out about this by stealing encrypted documents and uses that to his advantage. I'm going to have to assume that the review doesn't mention this.
I've read/watched a lot of reviews and not one of them have mentioned this. And why dose lex think that a green rock might effect superman before testing it on zods corpse?
Great review with great points! I really enjoy the reenactments of the scenes, even if they could just wait until DVD.
This is one of the better ones and I liked that both Joe and Doug were both together united against Snyder instead of them against each other. And all of their points are valid and I did have the same criticism points from my experience.
When Are Critics Wrong? | Channel Awesome Funny how he's making this now, considering that we have an ongoing thread about this.
That list is kind of stupid. Aside from the overly long plot lines, it doesn't really have much point. No one watches a JonTron to see his thoughts on whatever media he's reviewing (Gee, he thinks the Bubsy series, Charlie's Angel, or A Talking Cat?!? are bad? What a shocking revelation), it's for the gags. Also, I'm not a fan of her criticizing reviewers with clickbait videos (WORST [Blank] EVER!) then making a thumbnail featuring 2 of the more popular reviewers, as well as NC (Who, love or hate, is one of the more well known) tossed in. The video does have it's fair share of points, but it's also counterproductive (I want people to create their own style, but I also don't want them to use sight gags or cut away from the review, and I also don't want them to do what they love, since it possibly detracts from the review). It sounds like she wants everyone to become Ebert, as her desires take away from what a reviewer could possibly do to make a name for themselves rather than be seen as "AVGN/Jon copycat #142." Her complaint about humorous reactions to strange moments was fucking stupid, as most creators' intent when making such scenes is to elicit a reaction, not to have everyone sit back and watch with dull eyes. Also, I find the one guy in the comments who basically replies to everyone hilarious.
Yeah that video was pretty hypocritical with some of its points. Oh well. Just another clickbait video..
Honestly, it's not that unpopular online to find people preferring MotP to the live action movies. Only the mainstream audiences snubs it and aren't even aware it exists.
