When she went to Hammer Industries, she also took out around 10 guards while happy took 20 minutes to knock out 1 guy. That displayed her skill right there, more than anything as it sort of served as notice to her skills not yet seen in the MCU. Ultimately, I believe it was simply a business decision, basing off purchasing trends of the target demographic for action figures, and assuming Black Widow wouldn't be profitable enough to justify creating new molds, other than a standard 6inch figure, which more than likely was a repaint/minor remold of a previous BW figure.
Finally saw it. Though I'm not sure how to feel about the movie as a whole, for the most part it was pretty darn good. Ultron was pretty much the best thing about the film, and I was disappointed when he began to appear less and less as things went on.
Avengers: Age of Ultron - Hot Toys 1/6th Scale Vision Figure Revealed - ComingSoon.net I don't know I love the figurines but Vision looks cross eyed to me, anyone else?
Only in the first image, looks perfectly fine to me in all other shots. Amazing figure. Like pretty much every Hot Toys figure...they're so expensive, so I think I'll stick to my Mark V. Would love to own this though..along with the Heartbreaker armor, Mark 42, a Cap one...etc. etc.
That was more epic then what the we got in the movie, but the final cut was still awesome none the less.
Agree. This is one of many huge plot holes in the movie. Even though at the end iron man 3 he says he will always be Iron Man, that one line is not enough for him to continue being iron man in the avengers movies. Huge fail on Marvels part.
Disagree. No where at the end does it show he will continue making armors. A viewer shouldn't have to "assume" things have happened between films, or made to think. Everything single thing should be explained fully from film to film.
A lot of people seem to misunderstand the ending of Iron Man 3. The point wasn't that he wasn't going to suit up, or that there would never be another Iron Man suit, it was that Iron Man and Tony Stark were different people, whereas throughout the whole movie he and his loved one(?) were having a hard time telling the difference. EDIT:: Point still stands, it seems I'm not the only one who had Kingfish's sarcasm go right over their head.
when Tony says [not an exact quote] "I will will always be Iron Man" that one line was MORE then enough for him to continue being iron man in the avengers movies. how could he continue being Ironman with out suits or tech of some kind? Huge fan or general viewers do not need to be spoon feed the very obvious. The line in question fully explained the issue
It's pretty much like the whole Black Widow monster controversy....it's one of those many things that get lost and misinterpreted easily.
Then why blow up how many uh...millions of dollars worth of iron man tech? Only to turn around and essentially rebuild them in the form of the iron legion. That was a huge gap in logic So it seems Roberts contract was done at the end of Iron Man 3, hence blowing up the armors and potentially ending his career as Iron Man
him destroying the armors was a way of showing Pepper that he will no longer be 100% obssebed in building suits every single day. since after the NYC invasion he became obessed in building suits every day, thats why we were at the mark 42 in IM3, spending less time with her and the ppl he cared. so him destroying them was to show that he wont be obessed with them but yeah the film was RDJ last film, but the end of the credits said that Iron Man would return, so they can firm plans for the character in future films even if RDJ didnt returned, even Kevin Feige said sometimes that Iron Man would be featured in post IM3 films regardless if downy was in or not
