SaberPrime
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
9,290
Trophy Points:
247
Positive ratings received:
2,657

Post Ratings

Received: Given:
News Credit 0 0
Like 2,657 209
    1. K2flygurl
      K2flygurl
      It was suppose to be one post, but this site allows no more 420.

      Viewers could at first think they have two parents, but raise their kids alone, but soon find out that’s not true.
    2. K2flygurl
      K2flygurl
      The problem with Cybertronian kids is not because they’re robots, but that boy meets girl and they had a baby is boring. It would be much better to have them came form one parent, either built or born. Yeah it makes more sense to build them grown, but just saying if they’re ever going to show “child” Transformers again being built or born form one parent is less confusing.
    3. K2flygurl
      K2flygurl
      Hey was lurking through some old threads and found one about Arcee vs WB. You was in some debate with soundwaver on about baby bots and I agree with both. I like the idea of a Cybertronian child being built or coming from asexual reproduction, but like you said people are going to think robosex first. However the audiences will sooner or later find out they were built.
    4. K2flygurl
      K2flygurl
      Also if Hasbro say they are then they are. They don’t have follow real rule logic. They have sparks and made by a magical objects or godbots. Real world rules and logic would not reply to them.
      1. SaberPrime
        SaberPrime
        That's not the case in every continuity. Even in the continuities that use those terms they can be easily explained away by technology.

        The only continuities I can't explain away using real world logic... Aligned it's said that the Transformers were actually the first life forms in the universe and they created everything else. Bayverse exactly how Transformers lives are formed is largely inconsistent.
        Oct 14, 2019
    5. K2flygurl
      K2flygurl
      But transformers are lifeforms. https://www.deviantart.com/tramp-graphics/art/Mechanobiology-101-215658892. They don’t have sex, but they can and bud. Sure it was forgotten and only in g2, but it still counts. Nowhere did it states that life has to reproduce naturally. And if an artificial being follow all the seven criteria of life then they will be consider as artificial lifeforms.
      1. SaberPrime
        SaberPrime
        What are you even talking about? Of course they'd be considered artificial lifeforms, that's what a robot is. What does that have to do with anything? I don't even know what you're responding to.
        Oct 14, 2019
    6. DeletedUser_117894
      1. SaberPrime
        SaberPrime
        Not an expert but even a sixth grader knows you can't trade mark common words. You don't need to be an expert to know that.
        Aug 17, 2018
      2. DeletedUser_117894
        DeletedUser_117894
        I am sure Apple® is glad you've released them from their trademark with your intellect and maturity.
        Aug 17, 2018
    7. GoLion
      GoLion
      Hey, I hear you, I knew you weren't trying to be racist or anything.
    8. Awesomepow
      Awesomepow
      Hey,you still doing the RPG/Game you made?

      Thanks,
      Awesomepow
      1. SaberPrime
        SaberPrime
        Has anyone even posted in that? I haven't gotten any alerts for it.
        Aug 21, 2017
      2. Awesomepow
        Awesomepow
        Me,oh I see your new reply.Going now.
        Aug 21, 2017
    9. Fanatic97
      Fanatic97
      Do you still have the RID 01 MEgatron for $25?
    10. TFFan01
      TFFan01
      You said you were an actor. Did you meant a theater actor? just curious.
      1. SaberPrime
        SaberPrime
        Yup. Was in theater for years both on stage and off. I prefer being on stage for straight plays but I'm not a singer/dancer. Still like to be involved so that's when I work crew. Plus I got my YouTube channel where I occasionally post sketches when I actually have ideas for them.
        Jul 11, 2017
      2. TFFan01
        TFFan01
        Ok cool.
        Jul 12, 2017
    11. abates
      abates
      It seemed reasonable at the time, but yes, I've since moved Servo to the Autobot column.
    12. eagc7
      eagc7
    13. eagc7
      eagc7
      no they didnt intended for 6 autobots, they intended for a 5 autobots lineup. Ironhide was not added till she was removed. also they didnt removed her because bay disliked fembots, they removed her because she was too small (which didnt changed for ROTF) and because due to being the first film they thought they needed to explain how the heck there are female robots (which seems was no longer an issue for rotf)

      and again writter Roberto Orci said the bike was not written for Arcee. he said the scene was came up with after she was out of the script. Arcee was out of the script when they begun filming.
    14. eagc7
      eagc7
      Well Bob Orci said it was not intended to be for Arcee, as they came up with the scene after Ironhide replaced her.

      Only said that if he had came up with the scene earlier and Arcee had not been cut, she would've been the bike, but he came up with the scene after she cut, thus meaning that scene was never written as an Arcee scene in mind.
    15. eagc7
      eagc7
      ----------
      2007 Arcee
      ----------
      the motorcycle on the movie wasnt Arcee, especially considering they said the scene was made after she was cut, heck the bike doesnt matches 2007 arcee bike mode (she already had an bike and robot mode designed which served as basis for her). but Longarm and Stratosphere on the other hand are what u said, vehicles that were there just there in the film that Hasbro just decided to make toys off for make more money
    16. eagc7
      eagc7
      well yeah the toys are made before the film comes, but they had alot of time to fix Wheeljack box name to Que (as they were intended for an Holidays 2011-February 2012 release), but still doesnt matter if the name was changed for the film, the fact they still used the name on tie in media and toyline, still makes the Non-Movie name valid and therefore makes him an version of Wheeljack. doesnt matter if the Wheeljack name is not canon on the film, if it was used on an official Transformers merchandise, its valid. both Wheeljack and Que are valid names for the character because they were used for the same guy in official tf merchandise. if the Wheeljack name had never used in official dotm merchanise, then i would agree that Wheeljack is not valid, but since it was used, ITS VALID.
    17. eagc7
      eagc7
      ----------
      If that's your excuse it still doesn't work. Wheeljack is a retool/repaint of Que.
      ----------
      Que, the blue que, not the repaint, was named Wheeljack in the toylines, comics, books, video games, the retool/repaint is even meant to represent the same wheeljack from the movie aka Que in his older body from the comic books before he was blown up by Shockwave and rebuilt to his que form.

      look at the package of his box
      [IMG]
    18. Decepticons
    19. Decepticons
      Decepticons
      Love the signature with the Fallen's different incarnations, but, if you don't mind me asking, where did you find that image of, what I'm assuming to be, a Prime-inspired Fallen?
    20. kaijuguy19
      kaijuguy19
      How's it going?
  • Loading...
  • Loading...
  • About

    Home Page:
    http://www.youtube.com/rialvestro
    Location:
    The State of insanity.
    Occupation:
    Actor