|
Originally Posted by article "but since 2009’s “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” that filmed here had an estimated $200 million budget (and earned $836 million worldwide), the budget for the new film in the franchise should be comparable." |
| There's only a four year difference between the last movie and this movie right? Which must mean that Chicago is still under a ton of construction because that city was demolished. So, what could they do there? Unless a Decepticon previously thought to have died in th battle suddenly wakes up and blasts his way out of there. I could see that being the opening scene. ![]() |
| Lets not forget that a very large decepticon ship went down in Chicago. We don't know what the government did with that. Not to mention the Ark still on the moon. That could still come into play. |

| Four years would probably be enough to repair/demolish any broken buildings. Personally i feel it'll probably just be for flashbacks. |
| Then who would they use as the villian? There's got to be a Decepticon(s) somewhere plotting revenge or what not. Heck, maybe someone didn't wake up on the Moon in the last movie and when he does is all like, "Well crap. I missed all that. Oh well, let me just beat on some Autobot butt anyway." |
| Maybe in a fictional universe like the movies four years is enough, but in real life, no. If a city took as much damage as Chicago did in the movie, it would be a long process. Look at the World Trade Center in New York. That happened over 11 years ago, and they still aren't done rebuilding. And that was just one small section of Manhattan, imagine an entire city destroyed that much. |
| Maybe in a fictional universe like the movies four years is enough, but in real life, no. If a city took as much damage as Chicago did in the movie, it would be a long process. Look at the World Trade Center in New York. That happened over 11 years ago, and they still aren't done rebuilding. And that was just one small section of Manhattan, imagine an entire city destroyed that much. |
| Thankfully the fictional universe of Transformers doesn't have to worry about that. Because Chicago wasn't destroyed in DOTM. Chicago is an incredibly large city (3rd largest in the US), and in DOTM the final battle took place in a relatively small area of the city. The metropolitan area, where the attack in DOTM took place, also was not destroyed. It had many locations of severe damage, but the infrastructure as a whole was very much intact at the end of DOTM. It's like saying "the pyramids were destroyed in ROTF." No, they weren't. One pyramid suffered a lot of damage at the top. The base of the structure remained, as did the bottom 80%. |
| Any Decepticons in Dark of the Moon are dead and gone - we wont have a Decepticon wake up in Chicago - four years after the battle. |

| That's why it's called a twist. You don't see it coming. ![]() And what makes you think there aren't any more Decepticons? Let's say for the sake of arguement that all Decepticons on Earth were killed. And due to the fact Cybertron appeared to have been destroyed when the space bridge collapsed, there aren't any there. But that doesn't mean there aren't any left. Space is HUGE! |