Sure did. Had and played the game day 1. The ONLY glitch I ever encountered was sometimes the video wasn't synced to the audio when doing the little fast travel cinematic. That's about it. But yeah. I dunno what else to say I think origins is probably my second favorite of the 3 arkham games. Even with the glitches people encounters in mind I would totally love to see rocksteady and wbm switch off between games. I think it's pretty safe to say they're aware of people's complaints and, given a sequel, would make a stellar follow up. I CANT WAIT TO LEARM MORE OF THE NEXT ONE (And the Mr. Freeze DLC! Can't wait for that too!)
I did not have it day one. But even then people always make huge complaints about even the tiniest bug so I tend to take any claims with large grains of salt.
I had it day one and i agree. except for certain crime stopper bugs my experience was mostly bug free since day one
Hush. Hell Yeah! I loved what Kevin Conroy did with his voice in Arkham City. It has this eerie unnatural presence to it, plus its not everyday he gets to voice a villain.
Well, I was honestly hoping they would drop the "Arkham" name after Origins. Then again, I guess we don't know if Knight is going to be a new story or a continuation of City's plotline.
All three have relevant titles. Arkham Asylum takes place in Arkham Asylum. Arkham City takes place in Arkham City. Arkham Origins tells the origin of Arkham. Batman is Arkham's knight?
Yeah, they're really just keeping "Arkham" as the series name at this point. Origins mentioned Arkham, like, three times in all the shit in the story mode. No it doesn't. the game just happens to lead in to Asylum. The main story doesn't revolve around Arkham at all. And you could say he is Arkham's Knight because he fights all the villains that break out.
Arkham Knight sounds fine to me. It makes sense due to the game series's name and storywise since Batman is both the Knight to Gotham and Arkahm when it comes to bringing order to them. I'm just hoping it'll be made for the PS3 and X-Box 360 for the people who can't afford to get a PS4 and X Box One.
It kinda does. Sharp mentions opening the Asylum back up, so technically it'd be the origin for Arkham being open at the time of Arkham Asylum.
That doesn't make Arkham Origins an origin of Arkham. That's like saying Batman Begins is Joker's origin because he's briefly alluded to at the end. Origins in no way features Arkham's establishement. It also makes it out like the Asylum is brand new, verses AA making it clear it has been open for a while, and the recent re-opening is a crock 'o' that shit. Nothing about the main story of Origins revolves around Arkahm. As I said, it's only mentioned, like, three times. Nah, let's just force people to buy the next gen rather than let them decide.
So a mention is an entire origin? Lol okay. Arkham Asylum told a better origin story for Arkham than Origins did.
