Gamespot sucks at ratings! |
11-18-2006, 12:13 PM
|
#11 | | Something goes here Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Minnesota | The guy that reviewed Zelda:TP at Gamespot also reviewed Zelda:OOT and give it a 10. It's shocking.
It seems that if the sound was better, Zelda:TP would have made 9.0 or higher. The guy seems to hate the fact that they're not using voice over work and that the music is pretty much the same music that has been in Zelda games since it was first created on the NES. IGN's review said similar things but they gave it a 9.5. |
| |
11-18-2006, 03:34 PM
|
#12 | | Custom Made Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 4,382 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii is Home. BEAVERton, Oregon is where I live and work at. Collection Count: Enough | also, everyone says Zelda has been of the most wanted/popular game for a while now yet on their top 10 of all systems, Zelda was no where there (this was a few months ago)...there were 10 other games they claimed were more popular. hmm... |
| |
11-18-2006, 05:22 PM
|
#13 | | Herald of Unicron Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 3,563 Location: Port Jervis, NY | The scores mean shit. Don't pay attention to them. READ the reviews and consider the points they make. The Zelda review makes a good point about the familiar gameplay, and I understand why they knock it down a bit for that. But, for me, I want to play a Zelda game precisely BECAUSE of that familiar gameplay. So what was a negative for them is a positive for me.
And unless you have played the new Zelda (my guess is you haven't), how can you fault them for their score? It is equally likely - hell, it is MORE likely- that a lethal combination of hype and nostalgia are causing other reviewers to inflate the game's score. |
| |
11-18-2006, 05:28 PM
|
#14 | | Never Forget Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 29,276 Location: Sheffield, UK News Credits: 1 | Could it just be that Zelda just isn't all that anymore?
:O |
| |
11-18-2006, 05:31 PM
|
#15 | | Jibba Jabberin' Automod Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 178 Location: Abbotsford,B.C, Canada Collection Count: 400ish | I dont buy games based on reviews anyways. For most games I buy them based on previous games in that series or I rent the game and try it out. Reviews are nice so you can get a feel for some of the pros and cons in a game. They're by no means a way to decide whether to buy something or not they're just one persons interpretation of their experience and its a way to let people know what they're getting themselves into. |
| |
11-18-2006, 05:32 PM
|
#16 | | YO GONNA BLEED Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 6,245 Location: California Collection Count: 42 News Credits: 1 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Twin Twist Could it just be that Zelda just isn't all that anymore?
:O | Oh no you didn't!  Twitter Flickr |
| |
11-18-2006, 07:04 PM
|
#17 | | Destroyer of Scudsy Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 126 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by misterd The scores mean shit. Don't pay attention to them. READ the reviews and consider the points they make. The Zelda review makes a good point about the familiar gameplay, and I understand why they knock it down a bit for that. But, for me, I want to play a Zelda game precisely BECAUSE of that familiar gameplay. So what was a negative for them is a positive for me. | Spot on. They complain that the series just hasn't taken any large steps since Ocarina, and while that's true and reasonable to subtract points for, it's not necessarily a bad thing. Zelda: TP is supposed be the perfection of the 3D Zelda in the way we know it and last of what it's supposed to be in it's current form. The Devs have been pushing that since the beginning of development.
And the reviewer doesn't just complain about the sound. While obviously a crappy speaker or turning it off and no sound would ruin the atmosphere, that probably wasn't the main reason for the subtraction. He does complain about the controls being just another way of playing while sometimes being less precise at times. But really, he gave the game a perfectly fine score. Really, this review has gotten so much shit that it's ridiculous. There's actually a thread on Neogaf with a bunch of fanboys actually attempting to find out Jeff Gerstmanm's address. People really read into the score too much and need to start reading the actual review. The guy goes into a fair amount of detail.
Honestly, the review has put me off from the Wii version, but at this point, unless I really aren't getting the Wii till somewhere near early December(which I highly doubt) i'll probably dive into the Wii version. Nintendo just has the launch set up far too well. |
| |
11-18-2006, 07:20 PM
|
#18 | | Please, call me Steve. Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 22,616 Location: Colorado (Spanish for "prettier than your state") Collection Count: Less than 5 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DevilzFan Is it really that important that some schmucks rate a game as high, or higher, than some other group of schmucks?
Honestly, when I look at a game review, I'll take into account the scores it received from all the major outlets. I won't rely solely on just one website's score. | Agreed.
I don't often read reviews, but when I do I find that the actual content of the review is more valuable than an overall number. www.seatstaysup.com |
| |
11-18-2006, 08:33 PM
|
#19 | | Movie Megs eats your soul Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 971 Location: Oklahoma News Credits: 1 | Quote: |
Originally Posted by DevilzFan Is it really that important that some schmucks rate a game as high, or higher, than some other group of schmucks?
Honestly, when I look at a game review, I'll take into account the scores it received from all the major outlets. I won't rely solely on just one website's score. | I do the same.
In the end, reviews are merely glorified opinons, and one's personal bias are often different from anothers
I DO see the point Gamespot is making: that despite the new control scheme, the game really isn't that different from OoT which was released nearly a decade ago, and considering the many advances in music, sound, and presentation, much less the improved hardware and extra storage space, the reviewer found it lacking.
Now, 8.8 is certainly nothing to scoff at in light of Gamespot's usually tough reviews If anything goes wrong...blame Twin Twist Quote: |
Originally Posted by Grimlock 13 I'm not going to shell out import fees just because a toy is missing a blob of paint on its ass. | |
| |
11-18-2006, 08:56 PM
|
#20 | | Something goes here Join Date: Aug 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Minnesota | Well, this Zelda was meant for Gamecube originally.
It's only 1 review. If you let your game buying habits be dictated by them, you're a fool. You really need to judge the game yourself. |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Tools and Information | | | | | | | Gamespot sucks at ratings! Page 2. Transformer World 2005 is the largest fan community related to Transformers toys. Features information on Transformers 2, the sequel to the Transformers Movie, Transformers Animated, Classics 2.0, Optimus Prime and Megatron. Daily news, toy resources, galleries, Transformers wallpapers and more are available.
Check us out for Transformers, Transformer, Transformers 2, Transformers Movie 2, Transformers Movie, Transformers Animated, Classics 2.0, Transformers Universe, Transformers Toys, Transformers DVD, Transformers Wallpapers, Transformers Images, Transformers News, Transformers Resources, news, sequel, Transformers Comics, Optimus Prime, Megatron, Bumblebee. |  |