by PrimesRule Who was worse, Malkovich or Jeong? |
| Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| JetFormer's #1 Bestie Join Date: Nov 2011 Posts: 1,240 Location: Cruzin' down the streets with Jazz. Collection Count: The word obsessed comes to mind lol | I couldn't help but laugh during the Sam and Wang scenes. Jeong was pretty funny, but Malkovich on the other hand got pretty annoying fast. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| The Big Engine Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 6,076 Location: Australia Collection Count: 50+ News Credits: 1 | Jeong, no contest. Malkovich was easier to take cos when he met Bumblebee, he was just like a kid on Christmas and I can relate to wanting to that. Ken Jeong was a total waste of time, money and script space as he was done. ![]() "It is necessary to get fully behind someone before you can stab them in the back" ---Sir Humphrey Appleby. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Or Paris Hilton clones... Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 7,640 Location: I'm hiding inside your genitals. Collection Count: I have some toys....and some faces.. News Credits: 1 | Jeong. Malkovich was awesome....Jeong was not. ![]() |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Predacon Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 482 Location: Australia | I had a genuine laugh from both of them. Probably cut Jeong though if I had to. Malkovich is the master even when playing camp characters. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Constructicon Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 753 Location: Aloha State. Collection Count: a little more than a dozen and growing! | Jeong. I just felt his character really served no purpose and the story still would had been fine without him. Malkovich was alright till he met Bumblebee, that scene was very unnecessary. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| May hope burn bright. Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 3,465 Location: A bit outside Mos Alba. News Credits: 1 | Quote:
![]() My Fanart My flickr My Junk needs | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Telly-headed Tyrant Join Date: Feb 2005 Posts: 11,639 Location: Beside the seaside, beside the sea... Collection Count: Probably more than my fair share | I could've done without either of them. I can't really decide between which was actually worse because both were just so painful to watch. Why do so many of the human characters in BayFormers have to be such cartoons? (and no, 'because G1 had a cartoon so it's okay when BayFormers is cartoony too' is no excuse) Autobloke in everything but name. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Eventually I Think Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 39,915 Location: everywhere and nowhere. Collection Count: More than few but less than all of them News Credits: 5 | I love both of these actors in their own movies. But in Transformers Dark of the moon.....They sucked. I don't know how but Bay can turn my favourite actors againist me. ![]() |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Rock! Robot Rock! Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 2,032 Location: I come from a land down under... Collection Count: 306 w/ 66 Robot Heroes & 2 KRE-O | Jeong. I enjoyed both of them, but Jeong screamed "trying too hard". I would've played his manic behaviour for drama and not for cheap yucks, and axed any sexual innuendo, in particular the bathroom scene. I either would've cut Malkovich entirely, as he was kinda superfluous, or combined his character with Dylan. That would've been interesting. ![]() Check out my parodies! Click pic for arts![/shamless plug] |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Junior Smeghead Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 9,928 Collection Count: not enough :) | I'm going to say Jeong because it just felt like he was rehashing the same character he's played over and over again instead of attempting to bring something different. I've enjoyed him in things like The Hangover and Mary Shelly's Frankenhole, but in Dark of the Moon he felt like been there done that. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |