Leader of Constructicons - Bring back Devs for TF3 |
07-09-2009, 12:29 PM
|
#1 | | Autobot Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 58 Location: Aspen Base of Operations Collection Count: 100 | Leader of Constructicons - Bring back Devs for TF3 I think they should bring back Devestaor in 3
HERE'S MY THOUGHT:
Overload is the leader of all constructicons and is the one contructicon that can make the rest combine. I say they go with that idea for the next one.
How else do you explain all the contructicons all over the place. 2 Longhawls, 2 scappers, 2 mixmasters, etc.
I only saw one Overload though:-)
I think that one transformers should be the key to transforming the rest. Then they can keep a lot of constructions for the next movie, make Overload a character with depth and then go with the idea.
Matty O
Mattamus Prime |
| |
07-09-2009, 12:43 PM
|
#2 | | Giggidy Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 129 | Good idea but I doubt it. He was a waste of money/time in ROTF. |
| |
07-09-2009, 12:44 PM
|
#3 | | Oi. Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 309 Location: Florida Collection Count: Uh... A lot. | Nah, I say that Scavenger/Demolishor is the leader. Because he's the biggest. |
| |
07-09-2009, 12:46 PM
|
#4 | | The Big Daddy Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 3,059 News Credits: 3 | he will be back, it was stated as long as there are protoforms that scan vehicles to become constructicons, devastator will always be able to come back.....the "one being" idea where the constructicons are just vehicles is RETARDED.....i mean seriously, people understand the reason grindor looks like blackout is because he scanned the same helicoptor mode.......WHY CAN'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT IS WHY WE HAVE SEVERAL CONSTRUCTICONS.....sheesh people use your brain  Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaprime Surely this is the meaning of life. Watching Ewoks get drunk off of "Moon-tinis," start fighting, then moonwalk and hump things. | |
| |
07-09-2009, 12:50 PM
|
#5 | | Autobot Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 58 Location: Aspen Base of Operations Collection Count: 100 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spin-Out Nah, I say that Scavenger/Demolishor is the leader. Because he's the biggest. | That's fine with me... as long as there's a leader... or "headmaster" I think it's a good idea.
YEAH!!!! Lots of constructicons but without Scavenger... (who should be a more prevalent decepticon character and they should expalin it)... they can't become Devs.
Don't care who they would have in charge... as long as the concept sticks.
A leader to make them all combine. Without him... they are "F"ed in the A.
Matty O
Mattamus Prime |
| |
07-09-2009, 01:01 PM
|
#6 | | G1 Burt Reynolds Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 3,339 Location: New Jersey, land of inexplicably high property taxes. Collection Count: ∞ News Credits: 7 | Quote:
Originally Posted by guard convoy he will be back, it was stated as long as there are protoforms that scan vehicles to become constructicons, devastator will always be able to come back.....the "one being" idea where the constructicons are just vehicles is RETARDED.....i mean seriously, people understand the reason grindor looks like blackout is because he scanned the same helicoptor mode.......WHY CAN'T PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT IS WHY WE HAVE SEVERAL CONSTRUCTICONS.....sheesh people use your brain | So every vehicle already has a set robot mode? Says who? That was just Bay and ILM saving money by reusing renders and characters they already had (Grindor/Blackout). Quote: |
Originally Posted by JohnnyWuFei You, "sir," are not Bill Murray. On a related note, Toxicon is made of awesome and win. Quote:
Originally Posted by jonatron26 i think toxicon may in fact be Bill Murray. | | |
| |
07-09-2009, 01:07 PM
|
#7 | | Predacon Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 459 News Credits: 2 | I don't see why he wouldn't come back, he wasn't killed, just disassembled, and even then...any construction can form him.
So possibly DEVS in part 3 could grow even larger as long as more and more constructicons combine. |
| |
07-09-2009, 01:09 PM
|
#8 | | The Big Daddy Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 3,059 News Credits: 3 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxicon So every vehicle already has a set robot mode? Says who? That was just Bay and ILM saving money by reusing renders and characters they already had (Grindor/Blackout). | exactly, it is the only logical explination, that is why grindor looks like blackout, same go for the constructicons, and ensures that devastator can be used over and over any way they want
if you think about it, say a protoform scans a helicoptor. he now has a specific look cause the helicoptor parts arrange themselves in a particular way in robot mode....why would the parts rearrange differently if another helicoptor scans the same helicoptor? and this ain't a new concept, it has been around since the DS games for the first movie  Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaprime Surely this is the meaning of life. Watching Ewoks get drunk off of "Moon-tinis," start fighting, then moonwalk and hump things. | |
| |
07-09-2009, 01:17 PM
|
#9 | | G1 Burt Reynolds Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 3,339 Location: New Jersey, land of inexplicably high property taxes. Collection Count: ∞ News Credits: 7 | Quote:
Originally Posted by guard convoy exactly, it is the only logical explination, that is why grindor looks like blackout, same go for the constructicons, and ensures that devastator can be used over and over any way they want
if you think about it, say a protoform scans a helicoptor. he now has a specific look cause the helicoptor parts arrange themselves in a particular way in robot mode....why would the parts rearrange differently if another helicoptor scans the same helicoptor? and this ain't a new concept, it has been around since the DS games for the first movie | Say an Autobot scans the same helicopter as Grindor. He would then look like him? Would that look really fit an Autobot? Quote: |
Originally Posted by JohnnyWuFei You, "sir," are not Bill Murray. On a related note, Toxicon is made of awesome and win. Quote:
Originally Posted by jonatron26 i think toxicon may in fact be Bill Murray. | | |
| |
07-09-2009, 01:20 PM
|
#10 | | The Big Daddy Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 3,059 News Credits: 3 | Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxicon Say an Autobot scans the same helicopter as Grindor. He would then look like him? Would that look really fit an Autobot? | who cares if it fits an autobot, they all start off the same generic body (except for headsculp, but even that changes when they scan a new alt mode). he would look the same if he scanned the helicoptor. hell if a decepticon scanned the same vehicle as optimus prime, he would look like optimus prime, but the movie wouldn't do that to prevent confusion  Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaprime Surely this is the meaning of life. Watching Ewoks get drunk off of "Moon-tinis," start fighting, then moonwalk and hump things. | |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | Tools and Information | | | | | | | Leader of Constructicons - Bring back Devs for TF3. Transformer World 2005 is the largest fan community related to Transformers toys. Features information on Transformers 2, the sequel to the Transformers Movie, Transformers Animated, Classics 2.0, Optimus Prime and Megatron. Daily news, toy resources, galleries, Transformers wallpapers and more are available.
Check us out for Transformers, Transformer, Transformers 2, Transformers Movie 2, Transformers Movie, Transformers Animated, Classics 2.0, Transformers Universe, Transformers Toys, Transformers DVD, Transformers Wallpapers, Transformers Images, Transformers News, Transformers Resources, news, sequel, Transformers Comics, Optimus Prime, Megatron, Bumblebee. |  |