Woman gets $110 000 a month in spousal support

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by CdnShockwave, Dec 4, 2009.

  1. CdnShockwave

    CdnShockwave The Prince of Poses TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2002
    Posts:
    10,548
    Trophy Points:
    266
    Likes:
    +0
    Toronto woman to get $110,000 a month in spousal support - The Globe and Mail

    $110 000 a MONTH?!?!
     
  2. Aernaroth

    Aernaroth <b><font color=blue>I voted for Super_Megatron and Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Posts:
    23,510
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +137
    A great deal of spousal support payments are created around the idea that the spouse should be able to live in the "level of comfort that they have become accustomed to". They also stated in the story that this spousal support will likely come instead of a redistribution of the couple's assets upon the finalization of the divorce, so this support level is likely meant to represent her claim on the assets of the marriage during its 33 year term. Also, though her personal income is rather enormous, it is dwarfed by that of her husband, and again, this support is likely meant to reflect that.
     
  3. grimlock1972

    grimlock1972 "No Mas" My Wallet

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Posts:
    18,198
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +59
    damn that is one hefty support check every month *imagines the plastic crack that could buy*
     
  4. Darkwing48

    Darkwing48 Heroic Decepticon

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Posts:
    1,832
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Likes:
    +0
    I hate the idea of spousal support.
    You work, you should reap your benefits.
    Spousal support is like letting the parasite suck your blood on another host.
     
  5. Optimus Sledge

    Optimus Sledge Yar har fiddle di dee

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    Posts:
    7,925
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +0
    Right on. It's not like the man got any benfits from being married, right?
     
  6. unicron's blues

    unicron's blues I need to get rich!

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Posts:
    2,431
    Trophy Points:
    201
    Likes:
    +0
    Ridiculous. If you don't work I dont see how you're entitled to anything, the kids are grown, you can't tell me that 10 grand a month wouldn't be enough to live on, sheesh.
     
  7. Bryan

    Bryan ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Posts:
    9,020
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Likes:
    +0
    If I work for 20 years for my employer, I will receive a pension for doing nothing. I will deserve this pension and I will definitely feel entitled to it. It will be based on my final pay grade and it will likely be more than I need to simply live on.

    She worked for 20 years. I would think she deserves a pension. Why shouldn't that pension be based on what her husband, who was in some ways similar to her employer*, thought she was worth when she still "worked" for him?

    *I'm not making a statement on the nature of marital relationships, just saying that he was the source of income for her, if only as an intermediary.
     
  8. Rodentus prime

    Rodentus prime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Posts:
    5,430
    News Credits:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    282
    Location:
    Hants, UK
    Likes:
    +307
    Wow, struggling by on $88,790.33 per month - how does she cope the poor woman.
     
  9. Darkwing48

    Darkwing48 Heroic Decepticon

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Posts:
    1,832
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Likes:
    +0
    In that sense, well she shouldn't be angry if he hired another younger employer who does blow, I mean, odd jobs for him.

    It part of the contract that she doesn't moonlight.

    :D 
     
  10. SCPrime

    SCPrime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Posts:
    4,134
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +18
    Staying at home and taking care of the kids/house is not working? Granted in this case them being that rich they probably have housekeepers/nannies but that's not the case in 99% of homes. On top of that, if the housewife (or househusband) stayed at home for all those years (perhaps because it was agreed upon that someone stays at home) then he/she did not have an opportunity to build any sort of career. How do you expect he/she now to find a job after the divorce? Yes, of course there are cases where the wife/husband were leeches during marriage (because they refused to work out of laziness). But if you married that type of person it's your own fault. There are much more cases where one spouse sacraficed a career to be a stay at home parent/housespouse. So the "working" partner is the only one to reap the benefits while the one who sacraficed a career gets left out in the cold?
     
  11. wildfly

    wildfly Lasers, 8 O'Clock, Day 1.

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2009
    Posts:
    14,024
    News Credits:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Likes:
    +71
    Don't forget the Sarcasm tag. Otherwise your statement may confuse someone.


    Now where was i? Oh yes, boo hiss, women contribute nothing to society etc.
     
  12. Darkwing48

    Darkwing48 Heroic Decepticon

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Posts:
    1,832
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Likes:
    +0
    Well, I understand that too, but like work, is the employee fired or quitting? (I disagree with spousal support in cases of the latter and for the former in case if the employee was moonlighting ) Was the "employer" current assets existed before the marriage.

    But many people in the US will simply reply, you should have thought of that before it happened.
     
  13. Wheeljack_Prime

    Wheeljack_Prime Don't eat me

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Posts:
    11,361
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +41
    Spousal support is BS. I thought the point of divorce was to separate yourself from your partner completely (except when kids are involved). You're getting paid for being alone

    My mom and dad separated two months ago (on the basis that my mom considers her life BORING), my mom is seriously contemplating full-out divorce. And I don't think my mom deserves a penny from my dad's paycheck for doing that.

    Divorced women, get your own damn jobs.
     
  14. Cheetatron

    Cheetatron Eh

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Posts:
    4,710
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Likes:
    +0
    It's fair, unless she cheated infact. Maybe she deserves more dude does make 3-4 mil a year after all.
     
  15. SCPrime

    SCPrime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Posts:
    4,134
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +18
    Well, on the basis of quitting you have to separate based on reasons for quitting. For example, are you quitting because the other person is abusive or cheated on you? If so, I think that’s a valid reason for quitting and warrant full benefits as would a person who is “fired”. Likewise, if you were “fired” from your marriage because you were abusive then you don’t deserve as much benefits. And this is why you can argue how much spousal support (if any) the other person deserves in court. It’s not an absolute percentage regardless of the circumstances of the divorce.

    As for assets prior to marriage, unless you have a pre-nup, it’s difficult to argue what assets you have prior to marriage and what you have accumulated after marriage but you can argue it to determine the spousal support amount.
     
  16. Scantron

    Scantron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Posts:
    8,249
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Likes:
    +3
    I have no problem with her receiving spousal support in this case. It was a long marriage, to which she undoubtedly made significant contributions, not the least of which is raising three children. Plus, if she is 'unemployable', it's not like she can just get a job and support herself; she gave up a number of years she could have been working to contribute to the marriage.

    I'm not keen on the whole "lifestyle to which [x] has become accustomed" thing, though. She should certainly be given enough money to live on, and live comfortably...but that can be done for far less than $110k a month, so maybe it's time to just get "accustomed" to a less extravagant lifestyle. I'm also not keen on...

    ...it's supposed to be spousal support, not ex-sister-in-law support. I don't see why she gets to claim supporting her sister as a monthly expense that should be included in determining her spousal support; the ex-husband shouldn't have to indirectly pay to support her family members.
     
  17. comaface

    comaface Crush, kill, destroy

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Posts:
    736
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +0
    What you're describing sounds more like... a restraining order. Divorce is the legal dissolution of a marriage, nothing more. There is no stipulation that it must be a complete and total separation in every way imaginable.


    $110,000 a month certainly seems like a lot, but $4 million+ a year is quite a bit, too.
     
  18. Wheeljack_Prime

    Wheeljack_Prime Don't eat me

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Posts:
    11,361
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +41
    What I meant was "if you want out - stay out"
     
  19. comaface

    comaface Crush, kill, destroy

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Posts:
    736
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +0
    Did I miss the portion of the article where it said she was trying to re-marry him, then?
     
  20. Computron34

    Computron34 Butt + Hurt = TF Fans

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Posts:
    3,569
    News Credits:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Location:
    Waco, TX
    Likes:
    +13
    Ebay:
    Twitter:
    So she gets 1/4 of his paycheck every month? And I agree, he should not have to spend his money on helping her sister.
     

Share This Page