why does vortex have disapearing wings?

Discussion in 'Transformers General Discussion' started by GENOZAUR, Apr 26, 2011.

  1. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +0
    whenever the combaticons combine to form bruticus vortex is always sporting a set of large fold away wings on the sides of his upper body as bruticus's left arm
    but he never actually has those same wings in vehicle mode and no wings in robot mode

    whats up with that anyway?
     
  2. FanimusMaximus

    FanimusMaximus Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Posts:
    16,295
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    282
    Location:
    Florida
    Likes:
    +116
    Maybe they fold up in a different way.
     
  3. MegaMoonMan

    MegaMoonMan www.megamoonman.com TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Posts:
    17,402
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +185
    Ebay:
    YouTube:
    It's a cartoon.
     
  4. Feralstorm

    Feralstorm I ship Nick & Judy TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Posts:
    17,268
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +224
    The cartoon model looks similar to if you separated the helicopter tail like you would to make Vortex's arms, but instead pointed them outward to make shoulder spikes for Bruticus.
     
  5. SMOG

    SMOG Vocab-champion ArgueTitan

    Joined:
    May 13, 2006
    Posts:
    17,761
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Location:
    Robot Narnia, Quebec
    Likes:
    +226
    DingDingDing!!! This.

    The cartoon model is based on an alternate transformation than the official one we finally got. This shouldn't be surprising, since all of the Combaticons have cartoon models based on early prototype versions of the toys that ended up being quite different in the final versions.

    zmog
     
  6. Nevermore

    Nevermore It's self-perpetuating a parahumanoidarianised!

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Posts:
    14,280
    News Credits:
    255
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Location:
    Germany
    Likes:
    +659
  7. Feralstorm

    Feralstorm I ship Nick & Judy TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Posts:
    17,268
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +224
    The 'alternate' Combaticons have always fascinated me, especially with them said to be the earlier rejected versions of the cartoon models.

    * Fairly toy-accurate designs with "nothing in common" heads. (a lot like the cartoon Stunticons in that regard)

    * Strongly divergent designs (even changing to different vehicle forms), but with heads pretty much dead-on toy-accurate (especially by cartoon standards)
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2011
  8. SMOG

    SMOG Vocab-champion ArgueTitan

    Joined:
    May 13, 2006
    Posts:
    17,761
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Location:
    Robot Narnia, Quebec
    Likes:
    +226
    Yeah, they're downright confusing... like they're caught somewhere in between the toys we got, and those rather extremely different model sheets.

    After all this time, I think the "Combaticon face" has become quite iconic, so I'm sort of glad they didn't end up looking like those model sheets... but I do sometimes wish the toys were more like the original prototypes.

    zmog
     
  9. hthrun

    hthrun Show accuracy's overrated

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Posts:
    4,879
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Likes:
    +4
    Ebay:
    I think a lot of G1 transformers on the show had parts that disappeared from one mode to another...
     
  10. doomboy536

    doomboy536 Universe Onslaught fanboy

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2008
    Posts:
    7,371
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Likes:
    +27
    Ebay:
  11. SPLIT LIP

    SPLIT LIP Dry built

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Posts:
    68,382
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    407
    Location:
    agile house
    Likes:
    +3,074
    Actually they look a lot like the Stunticons style-wise.
     

Share This Page