Which trilogy is Better that the Transformers

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by Rodihide, Aug 19, 2012.

  1. bignick1693

    bignick1693 Maximal

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Posts:
    15,038
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +10,725
    Yes it is. I grew up with toy story. All 3 movies were masterpieces. Tf 1 was good, rotf was meh and dotm was good but the series is not close to the masterpiece of toy story. Tom hanks > movie franchise. Every character in toy story had character even if they were a back ground toy. Transformers has one liner supporting characters. Toy story 3 makes you feel sad but yet makes you understand growing up. Transformers has explosions.
     
  2. AdamLV0489

    AdamLV0489 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2012
    Posts:
    66
    Trophy Points:
    57
    Location:
    Hungary
    Likes:
    +20
    Dark Knigt, Godfather, LOTR, Bourne, Star Wars....

    The TF trilogy is out of the race, bacause of ROTF.
     
  3. stepsongrapes

    stepsongrapes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Posts:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Likes:
    +13
    The tougher question is what trilogies are worse than Bayformers?

    I'd say Star Wars 1-3 is the only one that readily comes to mind.
     
  4. Chaos Prime

    Chaos Prime Combaticon

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Posts:
    6,729
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +2,440
    OOH, those two are like neck and neck.
     
  5. PrimesRule

    PrimesRule Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2012
    Posts:
    1,609
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +4
    How so? Transformers had multiple flaws like very limited characterization, too much human screentime and just Michael Bay period.

    Only things wrong with the SW Prequels were Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman, plus the whole Jar Jar Binks fiasco gone wrong.
     
  6. roccondil5

    roccondil5 sculptor

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Posts:
    540
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +1
    I would like to live in a world where the only things wrong with SW episodes 1-3 were only those you mention....
     
  7. Rodihide

    Rodihide Batmobile Autobot

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Posts:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Likes:
    +0
    ROTF blew the whole entire trilogy.
     
  8. Silk Spectre

    Silk Spectre The Evil Queen

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Posts:
    2,417
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +81
    :lol  Gotta agree there. I didn't enjoy the prequels at all. I could write an essay on all the problems I had with those films. They were awful to me.
     
  9. toaster

    toaster It's Hip to be Square !

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Posts:
    983
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Likes:
    +2
    Do you people have souls ?


    I think that was the whole point with Lotso. He was suppose to be this dark character that we can sympathize with. I mean he got replaced, that's gotta be hard for anyone. I actually felt sorry for the guy.

    Huh, would ya look at that. I'm more interested in talking about toys than the robots even after seeing all 3 movies yesterday.
     
  10. Murasame

    Murasame 村雨

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Posts:
    25,487
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    412
    Location:
    The Lost Light
    Likes:
    +13,653
    this
     
  11. Autovolt 127

    Autovolt 127 Get In The Titan, Prime!

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    83,294
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    462
    Likes:
    +2,915
    I didn't feel any sympathy towards him that's the point and I'm not an emotionless machine. Lotso is unlikeable in anyways. I wish they didn't bother making him sympathetic. I wish he was more of a evil jerkass for the sake of being one.
     
  12. Gingerchris

    Gingerchris Telly-headed Tyrant

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Posts:
    16,053
    News Credits:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    387
    Likes:
    +2,343
    Indeed. Sometimes people (or plushies) are bad just because they're bad. While I'm generally all for giving a bad guy a good backstory, I get kinda tired these days with stories always trying to make out the bad guy is only bad because something bad happened to them, like that it makes it somehow understandable and them less bad in the end.
     
  13. knoted

    knoted Resistor Transistor

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Posts:
    6,709
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +4,750
    (M)any other trilogies.
     
  14. Ash from Carolina

    Ash from Carolina Junior Smeghead

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Posts:
    15,966
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +3,233
    I admit that I haven't seen Hayden Christensen in very many movies so I honestly can't say if he's a good actor or if his role in Star Wars represents the limits of his talent.

    I have seen Natalie Portman in several films and the Star Wars problem isn't that she doesn't have range as an actor but rather that she played the part exactly like the director and writer wanted her to play the role. I watched her in Closer (hey she was playing a stripper) and it is difficult to imagine it was the same actor who seemed so wooden in the Star Wars films.
     
  15. Incepticon

    Incepticon |-+-|

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Posts:
    17,156
    News Credits:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    387
    Likes:
    +12,314
    I always find it amusing how many people mistakenly call Transformers a "trilogy" just because there's 3 movies. Real trilogies have a beginning, middle & end with an ongoing story/plot arc. The Transformers movies, however, were just 3 stand-alone episodes that are only tied together because of the characters who appear... not unlike the G1 cartoon. Nothing about this franchise is a "trilogy".
     
  16. adamid4

    adamid4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Posts:
    278
    Trophy Points:
    127
    Likes:
    +16
    No, they are tied together, and they also stand alone, it was a trilogy. Actually maybe even more so than other "trilogies" Indiana Jones comes to mind.
     
  17. Incepticon

    Incepticon |-+-|

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Posts:
    17,156
    News Credits:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    387
    Likes:
    +12,314
    Lord of the Rings was a trilogy. The Dark Knight was a trilogy. Star Wars was a trilogy. The first 3 Pirates of the Caribbean were a trilogy. Transformers is NOT a trilogy. Hell, even the original 3 Die Hard's were a legitimate trilogy compared to Transformers.

    3 stand alone movies does not automatically equal a trilogy. A collection, sure. A trilogy, nope.
     
  18. Avengers

    Avengers Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2012
    Posts:
    936
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +7
    Back to the future

    Star Trek

    Lord of the Rings
     
  19. roccondil5

    roccondil5 sculptor

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Posts:
    540
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +1
    Actually, as I said before, LOTR is not really a trilogy, seeing as the books were never meant to be a trilogy. They were writen as a single story which got divided into 3 for practical reasons
     
  20. toaster

    toaster It's Hip to be Square !

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    Posts:
    983
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Likes:
    +2
    I think that can be a bad thing though. People criticize the second one for being too jokey(I will never understand them) and the third for being too dark. I like the sympathetic route because I'm confused about it. I don't like him either but I feel sad for him. It's the same way I feel for Jason Todd in Batman: Under the Red Hood.

    It happened again.