Discussion in 'Movies and Television' started by eagc7, Sep 26, 2009.
all 3!!!!!!!, i dotn knwo if anyone posted a thread liek this but oh well
First one because it's had the "true" Green Goblin.
They all suck ass. Bring back Nicholas Hammond.
1st was good,2nd was great,3rd was awful,also please check your writing and don't just post it right away eagc7 because your in-proper use of grammar is rather annoying.
yeah sry, my grammar aslo annoys me :/
its ok,just wanted to warn you in case you accidently type a swear word.
The one from like 30 yrs ago.
2. No question.
Eh, I guess 1. They aren't the greatest in the first place, but neither is Spiderman.
A vote for "they all suck", here. I thought the first two were decent to watch in the theatre, since the special effects were handled very well, but Peter came off as incredibly whiny and the Peter/Mary Jane subplot bored the hell out of me. I tried watching the first movie on DVD a little while ago and only made it through ~45 minutes before shutting it off; without the spectacle of the big screen, the plot was unbearable. I was interested in the 3rd one, because of Venom, but read the novelization first and found that it was utter garbage. One of my co-workers, who watches pretty much everything, confirmed that it was, indeed, garbage and that I was right for skipping "emo Spider-Man".
Spider-Man 2 was my favorite of the movie series.
SM2 because SM1 was just his orgin, plus they didn't go with the good GG concept (the scary, with purple one), but SM1 did get my love for having GG. SM3 ruined my fanlove for Venom. And the GG2/NG story sucked.
The 90's Spider-Man animated series blows them all out of the water. Continue that one, goddammit!
I'm sick and tired of it being left at this:
Spiderman 2 is my my third favorite superhero film while animation wise, Spectacular Spiderman
2 was the best. and spell check and grammar check if you can before you race to press post thread. it feels like i am gaming reading this thread.
Separate names with a comma.