Discussion in 'Transformers Comics Discussion' started by shadow panther, Jul 26, 2016.
I got to read this today and it is revealed that Tarn is...................
Really, I thought
had claws and no face....
well someone has had this theory one year ago.
Look back at #39.
We see Tarn being rebuilt into his current body in a flashback. Empurata also isn't irreversible.
That's fucking stupid. All of that set up for
, and its some dipshit character we saw for one issue. It's like if R+L=J actually turned out to be Hodor+Horse=J, this legitimately pisses me off.
Meh. I just don't care anymore. This character or that character. Don't care. It makes sense in hindsight.
No danger of just keeping it to yourself for a couple more hours after you got slipped a copy before release, eh? Haaaad to get that out there.
He threw up appropriate spoiler tags. I see no foul.
Although, I used to read the early release of some comics that my old shop would get, and I'd never spoil it.
Yeah, I'd prefer if this thread had not been posted. It's too tempting not to earn it and spoil it yourself. As for the reveal, well, I guess...
Glitch??? Not Roller???
That doesn't even make sense!!! Why choose him!
made perfect sense!
Roberts, for the first time you have legitimately ticked me off. He better have a GOOD explanation for this.
Total trolling dude.
I thought you couldnt make bots bigger without them freezing up. The animating force stuff. I guess this isn't that big of a body upgrade. Or maybe that's why the character needs fresh T-cogs.
This also, in a very weird way, explains the reason Tarn saved Skids.
Well, I mean I don't believe that this is true. Not trolling in a 'serious' sense.
Nobody forced you to click.
shadow_panther's got issues early before. I'm pretty sure he's not lying. With this reveal, certain things make a bit more sense.
So...is this going to be repurposed as the proper review thread, or what? I'm working on mine as we speak, should be up on Deadshirt.net early Friday. The title and OP seem to constrain discussion a bit, but starting another thread tomorrow seems redundant.
If true, it's interesting. Also, I like the double fake-out by Roberts. I went from not caring, probably not buying the book, to definitely buying the book tomorrow.
So a little bit of a spoiler (even if fake) has my interest piqued.
If it is true this is...disappointing to me.
Separate names with a comma.