Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Jux, Feb 6, 2007.
Why am I not surprised?
That's because they haven't been with me… Materialistic society FTW!
Then again… I value some of my TF's more than a couple of girls I've been with…
But material objects will never replace some good loving, NEVER!
Hahahahaha...I'd believe it
not a shocker
women, cant live w/o em, cant kill em.
And they can't pee standing up
Actually, that technology does exist now...
That's probably because a lot of women have never been with a guy that's not selfish in bed, not concerned about pleasing her at all eh?
I've said this before. Two words: dot matrix.
i chalk that up to most females being as superficial when it comes to picking males as they are just being themselves.
I'm not suprised at all.
When I was in elementary school, we had this nasty ass old woman custodian.
I walked in the boys bathroom one day and she had her pants down, her fingers spreading her stuff and she was pissing in one of the urinals.
She was nasty, and I was only eight, but it was still pretty cool.
I've heard it said over a dozen times
"A woman can have any man she wants, while a man can only get with a woman who'll have him"
she popped your cherry?
Giving up sex for clothes? Women are crazy.
I can barely be bothered to take my pants down for a blowjob.
I dunno, how can women be so materialistic? pschh. I would go with sex. I have more clothes then a Macy's already anyway.
I don't think this is about materialism-- its about practicality. I'd do the same. Psh.... clothes last longer then sex and if you got great clothes, you can get more sex in the long run. Easy choice. Sheesh.
I guess it all depends on the quality of the clothes and the sex. Sex is always there, but good clothes are harder to come by.
Separate names with a comma.