san francisco ban aims to spice up your sex life

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by GENOZAUR, Nov 28, 2010.

  1. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
  2. Rodimus Major

    Rodimus Major Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Posts:
    2,959
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    277
    Likes:
    +64
    Ebay:
    I kind of thought this was going to be about the happy meal toy ban.

    "Hey guys, if you stop buying toys, girls will dig you!" or something.
     
  3. Waverider

    Waverider Supreme Dude

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Posts:
    8,764
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    367
    Location:
    GTMO
    Likes:
    +498
    Ebay:
    Twitter:
    You guys do know that the SF mayor vetoed the happy meal ban?

    **EDIT**
    Scratch that. The SF lawmakers overrode the mayors veto before the Thanksgiving weekend.
     
    Last edited: Nov 29, 2010
  4. blumpy2000

    blumpy2000 PENGUINS CAN'T FLY!!!

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Posts:
    1,655
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +0
    Next up, peircing little girls' ears, then on to haircuts!!!
     
  5. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
    what i dont understand on the matter is this

    why is there a double standard o nthe matter?

    in the united states if a girl asa minor or a woman at any age is made a victim of female circumcision/female genital mutilation without thier expressley written personel consent on the matter for any reasons religon or otherwise that girl or woman would have every chance and every right to take the creep to court over the matter and to take some measure of legal justice on the matter



    so why is it if the victim is a member of the opposite sex as a minor boy or as a adult he gets his ass laughed out of the court room and made a total fool of by the gov and society for wanting to take the creep to court and to rpess charges agasindt that person and for wanting to take some measure of legal jsutice agaisnt the creep over the matter

    why the double standard regarding the sex of the victim on the matter and regarding the justice stystem and the gov and society on the matter?

    why the sexist attitude on the matter?
     
  6. firehawc_69

    firehawc_69 cloppers = ignore list

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Posts:
    10,633
    News Credits:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    267
    Likes:
    +34
    Campaign sticker:

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Deceptikitty

    Deceptikitty all about the hasubandos

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Posts:
    4,159
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +3
    I am incredibly anti-circumcision, but female genital mutilation normally aims at cutting off the entire clitoris and clitoral hood. The hood is homologous to the male foreskin - that's why female genital mutilation is considered a horrible thing: you are chopping off what's equivalent to the male's glans and foreskin on a woman. That's why there's more of a campaign against it.

     
  8. joebot.

    joebot. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,921
    Trophy Points:
    217
    Likes:
    +45
    Instagram:
    Gross
     
  9. Team Jetfire

    Team Jetfire Pop-POP!

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Posts:
    6,213
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    337
    Likes:
    +497
    Live and let live for christ sake.

    Why people feel the need to tell other people what their body is beyond me.
     
  10. Cavshock

    Cavshock Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Posts:
    1,006
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +0
    I honestly did not need another reason to never live in SF.

    Chuck
     
  11. Coeloptera

    Coeloptera Big, bad beetle-bot

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Posts:
    2,609
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +11
    Okay seriously, having the foreskin back cannot possibly make sex that much better.

    Seriously. It's fine cut.

    - Coeloptera
     
  12. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
    though i can only speak for myself on the matter i can certainly understand the mindset of the male victim on the matter

    for some guys its the fact that ones parents were never once willing to take into Consideration on the matter the THOUGHTS and the FEELINGS of the person who is the victim on the matter in that persons parents being so wholly cruelly inconsiderate and disrespectful of their being as a living person to treat their person as being little more then a pet or personel property on the matter in violating that persons most basic of huamn rights where FREE RELIGION and free speech are concerned

    for others its the fact that as a victim one has thier parents solely to blame for their body being robbed of a bodily organ that in no way caused them ill health at the time that person was robbed of said body part without their consent

    thats one of the things that can at times permanently destroy the personel unquestioning trust a person has in thier parents as the person who is the victim grows up into a adult over time and becomes aware of the actions thier parents have taken to irrivocably rob that person of the ability to have a say in the matter , of the ability to make his own choice in the matter of his own FREE WILL merely because their gov, their society or their religion asks it of them
     
  13. firehawc_69

    firehawc_69 cloppers = ignore list

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2008
    Posts:
    10,633
    News Credits:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    267
    Likes:
    +34
    Ok, for one, it's not an organ. It's foreskin. For two, it's done for hygiene above all else. Feel free to look up smegma and infected penises from not taking care of it. It's fucking disgusting.
     
  14. xanthax

    xanthax choppaface

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Posts:
    6,036
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    237
    Likes:
    +46
    "excessive skin loss" Um, what?
     
  15. Dran0n

    Dran0n miss me w/ that

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Posts:
    13,541
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    362
    Location:
    online
    Likes:
    +367
    Does this mean I'm banned from SF?
     
  16. Chaos Muffin

    Chaos Muffin Misadventure Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2004
    Posts:
    31,197
    Trophy Points:
    422
    Likes:
    +8,228
    The hoods must stay. Even if they look like grim reaper hoods.
     
  17. sto_vo_kor_2000

    sto_vo_kor_2000 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2004
    Posts:
    6,785
    Trophy Points:
    211
    Likes:
    +13
    I can tell you from personal experience that you are absolutely incorrect.
     
  18. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
    for some it comes down to being a matter of Free Choice and free Will or rather the lack of it when it comes to the male victim on the matter taking offense at their parents decision to rob that person who is the victim of thier free will in the matter and to rob that person who is the victim of their ability to decide the matter of thier OWN Free Will as a thoroughly honestly informed adult
     
  19. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
    free will and free chocie being the key words on the matter for any male person as the matter regards their person and their body
     
  20. GENOZAUR

    GENOZAUR Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Posts:
    3,209
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +5
    you ask me this is one of those private personel matters where government, society , religion and the collective will of ones pareents and families should be firmly made to take a back seat on the matter so to speak

    to be honest i happen to subscribe to the belief that this is a personel private matter that each man should and must be allowed to decide for their self in the case where one is able to live thier life in good health from the time they are born into this world to the time they reach the legal age of adulthood in the case where that person is fortunate enough to live their life in good health over that period of time in spite of the fact that said person has never been circumcised at all and is able as a audult throughout their remaining lifetime to go on living thier life in good health as a noncircumcised man

    more times then not though you can always count on the governemnt society or religion to find a way to raise some kind of unfounded moral panick on the matter asa way to worm its way into the matter and muck things up for that person though