Roger rabbit 2 back in the works!

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Gaastra, Dec 12, 2007.

  1. Gaastra

    Gaastra Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Posts:
    3,361
    News Credits:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Likes:
    +44
  2. Team Jetfire

    Team Jetfire Pop-POP!

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Posts:
    5,887
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Likes:
    +13
    That is hardly 'back in the works'

    It may be alright though...
     
  3. Ironhide2005

    Ironhide2005 PS3tag=DeaDPooLTFW

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Posts:
    5,390
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +1
    Cgi might be better this time around I think it will be a wait and see because I mean if they can make a indy 4 I'm sure we could get a roger 2
     
  4. 333HE

    333HE HERSHEY'S GONNA EAT JOO.

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Posts:
    816
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +0
    I don't have any high hopes for it...
     
  5. Dark_Convoy

    Dark_Convoy Old Bastard Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Posts:
    17,201
    Trophy Points:
    271
    Likes:
    +0
    I really hope they don't use CGI, the who thing that makes that movie amazing to me even to this day is that all the animation was done by hand.
     
  6. Ops_was_a_truck

    Ops_was_a_truck JOOOLIE ANDREWWWWWS!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Posts:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    236
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    I just want to check, because I might be reading this wrong - are you saying that the use of CGI might make Roger Rabbit 2 better, or are you hoping that Roger Rabbit 2 will have better CGI than the first film?

    The reason I'm trying to clarify this is because - honestly, I don't know if you're aware of this - a good bulk of the characters in Who Framed Roger Rabbit were just paint-and-brush animated into the film cells with the characters. There was some CGI, but a lot of the film just used old school animation.
     
  7. pscoop

    pscoop Dead inside

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,449
    News Credits:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +7
    I think they should let it end with the one movie.
     
  8. KA

    KA PENIS GOES WHERE?!!

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Posts:
    23,222
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +17
    i hope they up the rating and let jessica shows some tits this time.
     
  9. frenzy.mp3

    frenzy.mp3 Boisterous Ruffian

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Posts:
    294
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    :lolol 

    QFT
     
  10. dark_mullet

    dark_mullet Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Posts:
    418
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    After Rocky Balboa and Die Hard 4, I'm 100% in support of any sequel to any 80s movie/franchise.

    If for no other reason than being able to see a movie that I loved as a kid in theaters FINALLY.
     
  11. Dark_Convoy

    Dark_Convoy Old Bastard Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Posts:
    17,201
    Trophy Points:
    271
    Likes:
    +0
    I had always heard that no computers were involved with the making of what was seen on-screen in Roger Rabbit, and analog video effects were used for shadows and lighting on top of hand drawn cell animation which was overlaid on top of the film frames.
     
  12. Ops_was_a_truck

    Ops_was_a_truck JOOOLIE ANDREWWWWWS!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Posts:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    236
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    Actually, after I wrote that, I wiki'd "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" and yeah, you're right.
     
  13. Lazeric

    Lazeric Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2003
    Posts:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    They may have used computers to assist with the sparkles on Jessica's dress in the nightclub scene, can't remember for sure. But I think that would be the only place, everything else was done by hand.

    It's a rich, underused universe and I'd love more Roger tales. Don't like the idea of a prequel though, but that seems to have ALWAYS been the basis for the next RR film.

    What they should do is some sort of satire on the CG taking jobs aways from the traditionally animated folks, like Betty Boop's line in the first one. Than you can have a nice mix of live action, trational animation, and CG. Now that I think about it... I really want to see traditional animated Roger tangling with CG Roger...

    - R -
     
  14. MegaPrime33

    MegaPrime33 Follow me @NerdActivist TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Posts:
    9,766
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +1
    I am a fan of the original and I'm surprised it's taken this long to get out a sequel. I just hope its close to the same calibur as the original was.
     
  15. ambushbug74

    ambushbug74 Stroke me, Stroke me! TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Posts:
    7,750
    Trophy Points:
    241
    Likes:
    +0
    Could they have snuck more movie quotes into that article? I mean they seemed like they over did it to look like they had some Roger Rabbit cred.
     
  16. Ironhide2005

    Ironhide2005 PS3tag=DeaDPooLTFW

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Posts:
    5,390
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +1
    I support using CGI in the second but if they use 2-D animation its fine by me though if there gonna work with pixar most likely using CGI
     
  17. pscoop

    pscoop Dead inside

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,449
    News Credits:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +7
    Damn KA, you got mad skills, you could just draw your own.
     
  18. KA

    KA PENIS GOES WHERE?!!

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Posts:
    23,222
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +17
    nooooooo, i would feel dirty.

    waitaminit.
     
  19. MegaPrime33

    MegaPrime33 Follow me @NerdActivist TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2003
    Posts:
    9,766
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +1
    Dirty? From the look on Galvatron's face in your sig, I think dirty would be an understatement.
     
  20. ckhtiger

    ckhtiger old skool fool

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Posts:
    6,318
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Likes:
    +3
    *anxiously awaits drawing...*
     

Share This Page