Radioctive fish in Connecticut River from Chernobyl

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Biotoakid, Jul 6, 2010.

  1. Biotoakid

    Biotoakid I've never been wrong

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Posts:
    5,904
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Likes:
    +4
    Mmmm hmmm, nuclear power is safe.... Riiiiiiiight

     
  2. Cheetatron

    Cheetatron Eh

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2002
    Posts:
    4,710
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Likes:
    +0
    Superpowers...
     
  3. Rodimus Major

    Rodimus Major Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Posts:
    2,935
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    207
    Likes:
    +1
    Ebay:
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Aernaroth

    Aernaroth <b><font color=blue>I voted for Super_Megatron and Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Posts:
    23,501
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +130
    So because testing on fish has shown no link between the nuclear plant and nuclear poisoning, and there is more poisoning due to completely unrelated events that happened 20 or 50 years ago hundreds of miles away, nuclear power is unsafe?

    Sounds like someone's just fission for a link.
     
  5. seeker311

    seeker311 The Collector

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Posts:
    9,188
    News Credits:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Likes:
    +28
    freakin sweet
     
  6. joebot.

    joebot. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Posts:
    1,855
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Likes:
    +6
    Instagram:
    Well said sir
     
  7. Bumblethumper

    Bumblethumper old misery guts

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Posts:
    8,807
    News Credits:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    192
    Likes:
    +19
    Discovery channel aired an excellent documentary earlier in the year about the Chernobyl accident and subsequent clean-up. Anyone see it? Some of those guys are true heroes. That whole mess could've gone so much worse.

    Maybe nuclear power can be done safely, but knowing how fallible humans are, and knowing the suffering and devastation that can result when this technology goes awry, I'm not terribly comfortable with it.
     
  8. Coeloptera

    Coeloptera Big, bad beetle-bot

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Posts:
    2,613
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +0
    [​IMG]
    Is being very grateful for the thanks.

    See that medal? That is a Chernobyl Liquidator medal. Go look it up.

    Honestly though, nuclear power is safer than coal if one looks at total fatalities. In addition, France now gets just shy of 80% of all its electrical power from nuclear reactors and they have never had any major incident.

    They even have a breeder reactor, which essentially "recycles" the waste material.

    Frankly, it's really just an issue of spending the money on the infrastructure and there wouldn't be any big issues at all.

    - Coeloptera
     
  9. Star Sabre James

    Star Sabre James <b>The JUICE</b> TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Posts:
    7,785
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Likes:
    +1
    So the fish have less radiation than background levels. It sounds like they are clean to me. There is radiation out there. There's no way to get rid of it. It's normal, and nothing to worry about.

    The author of this article was trying to fish for something and it wasn't fish. He has an agenda, and hopes people are ignorant, and do not read the article too carefully to realize the actual story: the fish are clean.

    There is really no story here.
     
  10. MetalRyde

    MetalRyde is an a-hole with a heart.

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    12,973
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Likes:
    +63
    so this means i can't eat it?
     
  11. Aernaroth

    Aernaroth <b><font color=blue>I voted for Super_Megatron and Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Posts:
    23,501
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Likes:
    +130
    I would be more worried about mercury and dioxin levels from industrial runoff and pesticides than the radioactive stuff. But yeah, probably still not a great idea to eat it. Fish get BIG around nuclear power plants though, not because of the radiation, but because the outwater is often slightly warmer than the ambient water temperature, and the fish apparently go nuts for that because it helps plant growth or something. Fish get big around fossil fuel power plants too for the same reason.

    also
     
  12. Ziero

    Ziero TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    4,790
    Trophy Points:
    181
    Likes:
    +0
    Nah, it means not only can you eat it, but that it will actually nuke itself.
     
  13. rattrap007

    rattrap007 Insert witty comment here TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2002
    Posts:
    14,878
    News Credits:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    297
    Likes:
    +36
    indeed.

    Nuclear plants are safe and clean. Chernobyl is a lousy example to use against it.. Why? It was mad by Russia and was a piece of crap. It was poorly designed and made, hence the meltdown.

    Three Mile island? The plant did EXACTLY what one is supposed to do. It immediately shut itself down and went dead..

    This article is nothing more than some BS to further set back clean nulcear energy.
     
  14. Aaron

    Aaron Master of Crystalocution Moderator Content Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Posts:
    21,680
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    307
    Likes:
    +1
    Twitter:
    The radiation levels were in the non-edible portions of the fish. So unless you eat the bones you should be good.
     
  15. MetalRyde

    MetalRyde is an a-hole with a heart.

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    12,973
    Trophy Points:
    232
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
    Likes:
    +63
    hm. maybe i should have put this :p  in that question. oh well, live and learn.

    stuff about Radiation tend to freak me out, i blame those scare tactics in the 90s for it.
     
  16. 46+2

    46+2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Posts:
    5,604
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +0
    Uhh..ok.
     
  17. bumblebot98

    bumblebot98 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Posts:
    4,694
    News Credits:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +4
    Radioactive Fish?......Radioactive Fish-MAN!

    Now that's a comic I'd read :p .
     
  18. Wreckie

    Wreckie Holder of the Discomatrix

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Posts:
    711
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    Nuclear is as safe as any other kind of large-scale power generation, i.e, not very, when you get down to it.

    What frustrates me about topics like this is that people seem incapable of realising there's a drawback to every benefit and vice-versa. The debate which should take place over nuclear, coal, oil, gas, wind, biofuels, solar etc, is whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.

    Every way of supplying energy to millions of households will have an element of risk. Things can go wrong, people can get hurt or die. That doesn't mean we should turn off every power plant in the world.
     
  19. Greyryder

    Greyryder Kitbashed

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Posts:
    4,585
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Likes:
    +0
    So, strontium fish? Is this the latest Judge Dredd villain?
     

Share This Page