Discussion in 'Video Games and Technology' started by Ace Convoy, Jul 3, 2009.
i'm holdin up for the Go!(aka..N1000) later this year which would you go with.
Well, I would go with the Go! because of its lack of a UMD drive which makes playing games much easier. Very low load times, no sound when loading (Unless you have the volume on!) and internal memory! Plus PSN has the Video/Game market so, Go! os the way to Go! (Heh heh, that was a pun.)
Even though it's umd, I still would rather have a hard copy of a game.
An 80 dollar mark up for a device that cost less to make then the 3000. If I had to choose one it would be the 3000. I like looking at my piles of games
I would get the 3000. As a game collector and player I have no desire to own a virtual game collection. Hard copy or bust.
I'm sticking with my custom firmware 1000
I like the Go, but I want to know more about it before I would decide to get one.
i'm not into paying more and getting less. if i were to get a psp, i'd get the 3000, and stick it next to my ds lite.
I'd choose the 300 over the "Go!" any day !
Of course a 2000 is much better but if you have to choose between a 3000 and a "Go!" the 300 is better.
You can still buy games online and you always have the option of a UMD !
Plus the screen is smaller on the "Go!".
PSP Go. No UMDs that could break (or in my case, have broken). No UMD drive eating up battery power. Sleaker, more portable design, possibilitiy of an exclusive Aps store, possibility of Comics, Game Rental, and Music store. Not to mention it has a 40% faster processor then PSP 1000/2000/3000 which could mean in the future games will have a graphical edge on the Go.
2000. The 3000 has some display interlacing issues.
Exactamundo^^.....................The extra 40% processor has been confirmed by Sony to speed Up the USB drive not the PSP Go itself.
Yeah, that was confirmed by Sony literally like an hour after I posted, lmao.
Separate names with a comma.