Ebert still isn't done with the movie

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by Sideswipe1954, Jun 25, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sideswipe1954

    Sideswipe1954 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Posts:
    3,072
    News Credits:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Likes:
    +16
    Roger Ebert's Journal: Archives

     
  2. Valkysas

    Valkysas Attack Buffalo

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Posts:
    20,799
    News Credits:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    312
    Likes:
    +21
    I wonder if he remembers that he liked the first one.
     
  3. roy_flagg00

    roy_flagg00 I want more life....

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2008
    Posts:
    795
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +0
    and so the drumbeat for a new director/direction begins......
    this review was rough, but kinda deserved.
     
  4. jadtdt

    jadtdt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Posts:
    918
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Likes:
    +1
    While I disagree with all of that, it makes for an enjoyable, readable review.

    That worked out to my benefit - made it a lot harder to hear the seven-year-olds two rows back.
    That surprised me on a few occasions. Maybe because I was seated in the far right, but it sounded like it was coming from someone shouting in the audience.
    Haha he hates young people
     
  5. Autobot Burnout

    Autobot Burnout SANTARN IS COMING AGAIN TFW2005 Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2008
    Posts:
    26,346
    Trophy Points:
    357
    Location:
    Moxxi's Bar
    Likes:
    +398
    I love how he says "I've traced the history of Starscream from 1984...", he doesn't seem to realize Starscream hasn't been the EXACT SAME BACKSTABING POWER MONGER from G1, a few examples come to mind, like Armada Starscream and SG Starscream, who are both for the most part unlike G1 Starscream with the exception of the jet mode.
     
  6. knoted

    knoted Resistor Transistor

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Posts:
    4,431
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +116
    I kinda agree with Ebert, except for 1 single big point : he puts the blame on the designs ...and whether you like em or hate em, that argument is false.

    As a film critic he should know ; that any shape or form can be portrayed wonderfully in film ... provided that the camera shots, fight coordination & editing work : and that's imo, where ROTF partially failed.
     
  7. Blitz.

    Blitz. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Posts:
    6,079
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    202
    Likes:
    +28
    I think I can summarise what he feels

    1 it costs to much to make

    2 I dont like how they look

    3 I dont like bay

    4 I dont like the typical structure of action movies
     
  8. Coolyfett

    Coolyfett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Posts:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    My thing about Ebert is he is an old school cat. Many old schoolers have a major issue with people wasting their hard earned money on this kid of movie. That is why they wait till the summer time to release this kind of garbage. Because kids do not know the difference. The kids are also out of school with nothing to do but to ask there parents to see Transformers over and over again. The movie will make a lot of money, but many do not want to see the movie make a lot of money. That is why Ebert is attacking it again. This movie is going to give that poor man a stroke if he doesn't try to ignore its existents. He just needs to close his eyes and ears for a few months and it will all be over. Until TF3 comes out.
     
  9. Autobus Prime

    Autobus Prime Transit Former

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Posts:
    8,682
    Trophy Points:
    227
    Likes:
    +7
    V:

    If he didn't just barely mention it here, I'd wonder if he'd forgotten about TF07 altogether!

    The general negativity about the robots is weird, too, given that he said this last time:

    Now they make "no functional or aesthetic sense"? This is the same guy?

    It almost feels like he is embarassed at being 'drawn in' by the first one.
     
  10. Opticron Primal

    Opticron Primal Comin' up OOOs!

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Posts:
    10,340
    News Credits:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    216
    Likes:
    +5
    Did he just compare the movie to Spider-Man 2 and The Dark Knight or am I reading that wrong?
     
  11. A_U_T_O_B_O_T

    A_U_T_O_B_O_T G1 Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Posts:
    224
    Trophy Points:
    91
    Likes:
    +0
    People like him are the exact reason why I never listen to professional reviews. Ebert could have cut it down to 3 paragraphs and instead he rants on and on using that article to vent, thus making it hard for me to take him seriously.

    Is it just me or is there something wrong expecting Transformers to have strong human performances?
     
  12. jonatron26

    jonatron26 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Posts:
    1,930
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +0
    this is all i hear from him
     
  13. StarSaber79

    StarSaber79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    1,565
    News Credits:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +5
    I don't care about people like him he is an adult I am 13 my friend the same age as me told me how awesome the movie was today. He doesn't even like Transformers and he said its much better then the first. I just have a different perceptive when it comes to movies then critics the plot is not to important to me. It doesn't have to be Darren Shan witting to me as long as it has a story I can easily follow I'm fine. God now I sound like little child.
     
  14. Skeeve

    Skeeve Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,331
    Trophy Points:
    182
    Likes:
    +6
    He's talking about the physical appearance of the characters who bear that name. Not the characterization. And his whole point was that the appearance changed over the years.

    No, they SHOULD have strong human performances. Humans voice them for the most part, after all. Cullen usually brings his "A" game; problem is, the movies rarely give him any character development to work with.
     
  15. Autobus Prime

    Autobus Prime Transit Former

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    Posts:
    8,682
    Trophy Points:
    227
    Likes:
    +7
    A:

    Might he have gone on so long out of disappointment? He did seem to like the first one, and maybe he felt something was missing this time.

    As for the human performances, maybe we can read that as "character" performances. Ebert liked Wall-E a lot.
     
  16. Coolyfett

    Coolyfett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Posts:
    404
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    You are 13 and you are not a child??

    AMAZING!
     
  17. Laughing Man

    Laughing Man Not crossing the streams.

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    152
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Likes:
    +1
    Best part of the review:

    Todd Gilchrist of Cinematical...says "this must be the most movie I have ever experienced."

    Ha! I love that. And it's so true. Love the movie or hate the movie - it was definitely the most movie I have ever experienced. Quite the sensory overload.
     
  18. Satomiblood

    Satomiblood Prototype Black

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Posts:
    19,337
    Trophy Points:
    247
    Likes:
    +4
    Roger Ebert is a funny guy. I thoroughly enjoyed his exchange with Vincent Gallo over The Brown Bunny a few years ago.
     
  19. ian5555

    ian5555 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Posts:
    1,334
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +0
    Are you implying 13 is a child? Did you somehow miss the "teen" in Thirteen? lol
     
  20. Poho

    Poho That's MISTER Poho to you

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Posts:
    6,207
    News Credits:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    176
    Likes:
    +1
    when you look at this review, and then see his review for the first transformers, it is VERY clear that all the whining critics are doing is unjustified. all the things they liked about the first one were still there, just a lot more of it. if they don't like that, that's fine. but that's what i and probably a million others wanted to see in this movie.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page