Movie reviewer Confused Matthew, along with Stand-In Stan, review the sequel to Transformers. Edit: BTW, no flaming, please. Nor trolling, for that matter.
Y'know I don't mind ConfusedMatthew, but man I wish he'd stop doing stuff with Stan. Stan drags the whole thing down. :/
LOL wtf is he talking about the cgi. The CGI was infact perfect. Just another critic nit picking I supose. I stopped watching not even 2 minutes in thats how annoying they are to me as of now. 15 minutes of nerd bitching about a movie? Pft as if. I want those 2 minutes back nao >=(
I wouldn't call this stuff a review. It is 2 videos of flaming, trolling and hifive-ing. A small amount of opinion but mostly excessive over-dramatisation. I'm not a fan of the TF movies but across the internet, "reviews" of this nature have no purpose but to bait. I give their review 1/2 a star.
Generally Matthew can do some fun cynical commentary IMO- it's Stan who tries to one-up him all the time by becoming a hyperbole-wielding IMDB dweller that wrecks it for me. He's like some kind of massive bad influence that destroys subtlety and wit.
Wow! That was bad. You know guys you couldn't just skip the movie and don't watch it. you do have a choice you know.
Sorry. Lol But what I meant was still nothing more to the point. All they are doing is complaining about how they don't like the transformers movies. They hate it so much then why go see it in the first place. >_<
Amen. His review for the first one was somewhat entertaining even if some of his 'confusion' was just him being confused. This review seemed to just be frustrated anger because they didn't like it. I don't think many people can really disagree that the movie was lacking in substance or whatever. The point about Megan Fox's role being diminished... huh? Seemed about the same to me. The point about the CGI... huh? Seems like it's amazing to me. Maybe they shouldn't watch it on a TV from 1975 with the cloth netting for speakers. The point about the liason... huh? I thought it brought in a character that I was supposed to hate and I did. He did what he had to do and actually made a complicated challenge that they needed to overcome. It was a little lame, sure. But I felt the role wasn't totally wasted. The point about Agent Simmons I could kind of agree with. I agree with the squishy humans part for the NEST thing too, to a point. I think it could have been slimmed down to a more specific special forces that did something other than rack up casualties in battle. Still, NEST did seem successful in being the index finger that pointed out Decepticons for the Autobots to go beat up. They didn't mention the Twins or Leo, which seems like fodder for anyone who dislikes the movie. I think Robot Heaven is silly to everyone. Then they exalted Shia's ability to act. I have to disagree, since I can't see him other than his role in Even Stevens in anything I've ever seen him in. I think they missed out on why the movie WAS so successful. It had a lot of action and robots beating the piss out of each other pretty brutally. Most of the review was them swearing at Micheal Bay and talking about how great other movies were. I was at least entertained by the first movie's review, this just made me want to yell at them to stop fondling each other and talk about the actual movie itself.
I must admit..at least they came up with a new lie I have not heard before. "Jetfire transporting characters that weren't even there"
If by "there" you mean in the same airfield. Bumblebee and the Twins were not very close to Jetfire when he openned the bridge. I can sort of see the point he made here, and would not consider it a lie. It was an understandable assumption since BB and the Twins were not huddled beneathe Jetfire's beard.
So they're saying the CGI was bad by putting it on the same level as Pixar? Who in their right mind would call Pixar's work bad?
Lol not even. They went a step down from Pixar and called it go motion or whatever. If THIS is go motion then wtf have I been missing. >_>
