Bad reviews

Discussion in 'Transformers Movie Discussion' started by Golden Age, Jun 23, 2009.

  1. Golden Age

    Golden Age BATTLE BEAST

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Posts:
    2,778
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Likes:
    +0
    Do you think that all the reviewers are just "Geewunnerrs"?
     
  2. Superion33

    Superion33 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Posts:
    1,241
    Trophy Points:
    161
    Likes:
    +0
    Hmmmmm.

    I would say more along the lines of hateful, fat fanboys that are virgins and live in their mom's basement.

    And they kick puppies for fun.
     
  3. NemesisBruticus

    NemesisBruticus Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,719
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +0
    Im thinkin Micheal Bay Haters.
     
  4. NemesisBruticus

    NemesisBruticus Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Posts:
    2,719
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Likes:
    +0
    Movie kicked ass, end of story.
     
  5. Wheeljack_Prime

    Wheeljack_Prime Don't eat me

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Posts:
    11,359
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +41
    No, a lot of them simply dismissing the idea of a film that has its basest roots in a 80s toyline.

    A sentiment once felt towards adaptations of comic books.
     
  6. Faxon

    Faxon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Posts:
    1,065
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Likes:
    +2
    Plus a lot of reviewers seem to expect depth from a Micheal Bay film. It just isn't going to happen.
     
  7. shroobmaster

    shroobmaster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Posts:
    13,629
    News Credits:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    201
    Likes:
    +30
    Not really, but it is pretty clear that critics are still on the bay-hate fad.

    There's also the fact that they all went to a TEENAGER pop-corn flick with Schindler's List level of expectation.
     
  8. smkspy

    smkspy is one nice fucking kitty

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Posts:
    20,311
    Trophy Points:
    322
    Likes:
    +79
    Is that the best defense of the film that you can give? At least that other guy had the crazy conspiracy angle. You aren't even trying.
     
  9. Superion33

    Superion33 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Posts:
    1,241
    Trophy Points:
    161
    Likes:
    +0
    You gotta give credit to shrooby tho. His use of hyperbole is excellent! Kelchy would be proud. Now if only shrooby would start putting words in other people's mouths, he could take over for kelschy full time!
     
  10. buffbeefbroth

    buffbeefbroth Holier than Thou

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Posts:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Likes:
    +0
    I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
     
  11. Wheeljack_Prime

    Wheeljack_Prime Don't eat me

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Posts:
    11,359
    News Credits:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +41
    Definitely Geewunners would be in the minority. People like Ebert probably don't know/give a crap that Bumblebee was a VW Bug back in 1984, etc.
     
  12. smkspy

    smkspy is one nice fucking kitty

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Posts:
    20,311
    Trophy Points:
    322
    Likes:
    +79
    I certainly hope so cause my sarcasm detector was apparently turned when reading that.
     
  13. Incepticon

    Incepticon Double Agent

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Posts:
    11,272
    News Credits:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    287
    Likes:
    +134
    No, they're not 'geewunners'. It's just tons of ignorant people who expect stupid stuff like intelligent writing & dialogue, acting ability, characterization, cohesion, story, the desire to somewhat decypher what they're looking it, and apparently something that only elite industry insiders know of called... a "plot". I'm not sure what that is, but supposedly it can have a lot of mile wide holes if not addressed seriously. It's all a little too rocket science for me to completely understand, so I'm as mystified as anyone as to what these "reviewers" are talking about. Just because they're paid good money, have made careers out of doing it, are respected in most circles and even hailed for their ability to remain objective, have been fundamentally necessary to the movie & music industries as far back as when newspapers were invented, have entire publications built around their existence, can & do make or break careers, and have been THE go-to places for the general public to get an informed opinion for decades, I don't think they really mean all that much to anyone or anything. No, it's forums built for biased fans of toys, comics & sci-fi filled with equally biased 13-40 year old armchair critics that really give the honest & objective opions.
     
  14. Getter Rekka

    Getter Rekka Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Posts:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Likes:
    +0
    And there is no bay-love, geewunner hate-fad I suppose?

    Maybe directors are disliked for a reason.
     
  15. Moy

    Moy Constructicons!

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    Posts:
    7,716
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    222
    Likes:
    +109
    Bay already said to ignore the reviews, besides if you are a true fan, your in it for the Robots. TF1 also received bad reviews.
     
  16. TankRizzo

    TankRizzo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2007
    Posts:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebert liked the first one and the guy at AICN is a self proclaimed Bay fanatic, both hated it. Is it not possible that it's just not a good movie?
     
  17. Vangelus

    Vangelus Long Live the New Flesh Moderator Content Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2002
    Posts:
    14,914
    News Credits:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    267
    Likes:
    +29
    Ebay:
    So long as critics aren't adding "btw you're a mushminded fart of a waste of oxygen if you dared to enjoy this flick" on the end of their reviews, I don't see why one can't just enjoy the movie regardless. o_O 

    All criticisms and praises are valid to be stated so long as you don't insult someone for disagreeing with you.
     
  18. gstommylee

    gstommylee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Posts:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebert didn't like the robot action in tf1 and tf2 has more of that so ebert didn't like tf2 cause of it which is just silly imo.
     
  19. Ops_was_a_truck

    Ops_was_a_truck JOOOLIE ANDREWWWWWS!!!!!!

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Posts:
    11,549
    Trophy Points:
    236
    Likes:
    +0
    Ebay:
    Oh absolutely. I have no doubt in my mind that everyone that offered up a review on RottenTomatoes.com all grew up around the 1984-1986 era and that the original cartoon was foremost on their mind when offering up a judgment regarding this cinema. All of them.

    I certainly believe this. Positively.
     
  20. SPLIT LIP

    SPLIT LIP Dry built

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Posts:
    66,380
    News Credits:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    407
    Location:
    agile house
    Likes:
    +868
    I wish everyone thought like you.

    Unfortunately they don't.
     

Share This Page