people i got a question when it comes to the relationship shared by the villain and the hereo as it exists betwen the two what is it exactly that drives the villain to either A greive in private for the death of his enemy with perhaps a single follower of his being the villains sole confident on the matter when it comes to said ally being the single living person that the villain knows he can trust without question and can also expect to keep and maintain their silence on the matter when it comes to the villain confiding such matters to this sole confident . or B drive the villain to greive in public for the death of his enemy the hero with the villain at the very least showing up at the cemetery to pay his respects to the recently departed while standing in the background a relatively safe distance away from those attending the funeral. or at the most extreme for that matter actually show up for the funeral viewing and while present in his grieving actually make an attempt to speak and reflect on the heroes life, his impact on the world and those whom knew the hero in life and the selfless sacrifice the hero made as his final act in life when it comes to this potentially volatile matter resolving itself in such a way that the villain himself in a whole hearted manner of speaking actually delivers a rather touching eulogy on behalf of the departed hero and those greiving his passing into death or D take it upon himself to personally hunt down and murder the person who robbed the villain of his so called right to kill the hero and in doing so actually avenge the hero's death say for example in the case where the villain has himself been robbed of that so called right due to someone other then the villain having proven theirself successful in killing the hero thus robbing the heros main villainous counterpart of that so called lifes pleasure or for that matter in the case where the villain has been robbed of the heroe's death what is it that would drive him to make an attempt to restore the hero to life? on that last one people i figure their are at least 3 ways that last one would play out story wise 1. the villain succeeds in his attempt to restore the fallen hero to life either so that the newly resurrected hero would for a time be made to serve the villain due to the hero literally owing the villain his life, 2. the villain succeeding in his attempt simply so that the villain can speak his peace to the newly revived hero if only so that the villain could kill the hero himself or do a complete turn around on the matter and instead for a time part ways with hero in a somewhat peaceful matter or 3. at the most extreme people their is also the possibility that the villain would succeed in his attempt to restore the dead hero to life only to realise all to late that said formerly dead hero is a undead, unliving, monsterous, mockery of his former living self with the story ending in such a way that the villain is either killed by the monster as it's first victim or instead dies in the attempt to lay his fallen adversary's ghost to rest due to the villain giving his life in the end in the attempt to destroy the undead being as a way to repent for the actions the villain had commited in life. me i figure when it comes to the relationship as it exists between the hero and the villain that it can at times be a very sordid and warped one when it comes to the very idea of the villain greiving in for the death of his enemy. what are your thoughts people?